Blackjack15 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Unnamed Trialist 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markoaleks Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 Random post ….no context rewatching gold cup 2021 v Mexico tonight- Mexico TV feed Those 2 penalties awarded against us were about as Concacafy sketchy as they come on our best day….we are better than them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shway Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 17 minutes ago, Markoaleks said: Random post ….no context rewatching gold cup 2021 v Mexico tonight- Mexico TV feed Those 2 penalties awarded against us were about as Concacafy sketchy as they come on our best day….we are better than them Those two penalties would be called in any region with VAR. It hurt but if we were on the other end of it we would want the same call. It would only be concacafy if it happened to us and there was no call. CanadaFan123 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 14 hours ago, Shway said: Those two penalties would be called in any region with VAR. It hurt but if we were on the other end of it we would want the same call. It would only be concacafy if it happened to us and there was no call. I don't remember one of them, but the one against MAK where they were just focusing on if the player was in the box or not, I didn't think the replays showed any conclusive contact. Sal333 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Diego Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 1 hour ago, Kent said: I don't remember one of them, but the one against MAK where they were just focusing on if the player was in the box or not, I didn't think the replays showed any conclusive contact. The Henry one was stone cold. The MAK one was super weird imo. I don't remember if I posted my theory here or on twitter, but it goes like this: Referee calls MAK foul outside the box as FK. If ref thought it was in the box he likely doesn't call the foul as it would be a PK. VAR looks and sees that foul as called looks to be in box, so tells ref to review. Ref goes to review, but at this point he can only review if it is in the box or out -- he is not allowed to review whether it was a foul. It is clear that the contact was in the box, so it becomes a PK -- something the ref never wanted to award because, in his mind, the type of contact and location of contact does not warrant such an outcome. Obviously I am speculating on what is going on in the ref's head, but I guarantee this thought process happens in a ref's mind at times. Kadenge, Nate3322, johnyb and 4 others 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaFan123 Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 1 minute ago, El Diego said: The Henry one was stone cold. The MAK one was super weird imo. I don't remember if I posted my theory her or on twitter, but it goes like this: Referee calls MAK foul outside the box as FK. If ref thought it was in the box he likely doesn't call the foul as it would be a PK. VAR looks and sees that foul as called looks to be in box, so tells ref to review. Ref goes to review, but at this point he can only review if it is in the box or out -- he is not allowed to review whether it was a foul. It is clear that the contact was in the box, so it becomes a PK -- something the ref never wanted to award because, in his mind, the type of contact and location of contact does not warrant such an outcome. Obviously I am speculating on what is going on in the ref's head, but I guarantee this thought process happens in a ref's mind at times. You're spot on. Both calls were correct IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unnamed Trialist Posted January 13, 2022 Share Posted January 13, 2022 1 hour ago, El Diego said: The Henry one was stone cold. The MAK one was super weird imo. I don't remember if I posted my theory here or on twitter, but it goes like this: Referee calls MAK foul outside the box as FK. If ref thought it was in the box he likely doesn't call the foul as it would be a PK. VAR looks and sees that foul as called looks to be in box, so tells ref to review. Ref goes to review, but at this point he can only review if it is in the box or out -- he is not allowed to review whether it was a foul. It is clear that the contact was in the box, so it becomes a PK -- something the ref never wanted to award because, in his mind, the type of contact and location of contact does not warrant such an outcome. Obviously I am speculating on what is going on in the ref's head, but I guarantee this thought process happens in a ref's mind at times. Well done, that is exactly how I recalled it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 5 hours ago, El Diego said: The Henry one was stone cold. The MAK one was super weird imo. I don't remember if I posted my theory here or on twitter, but it goes like this: Referee calls MAK foul outside the box as FK. If ref thought it was in the box he likely doesn't call the foul as it would be a PK. VAR looks and sees that foul as called looks to be in box, so tells ref to review. Ref goes to review, but at this point he can only review if it is in the box or out -- he is not allowed to review whether it was a foul. It is clear that the contact was in the box, so it becomes a PK -- something the ref never wanted to award because, in his mind, the type of contact and location of contact does not warrant such an outcome. Obviously I am speculating on what is going on in the ref's head, but I guarantee this thought process happens in a ref's mind at times. I had the same thought, but do we know that the bold above is true? Couldn't they just make it more generic and he is reviewing whether it should be a penalty? Like if he called a penalty and the VAR says "look at this" with the exact same video, he could overturn it and say no penalty, there was no foul. If the bold above is true and my hypothetical is true, it just proves another angle of the ridiculousness of VAR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Addona Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Wasn't sure where to post this, but I just got this in the mail ... it looks fantastic! Thank you! Edgewater17, Admin, Cheeta and 5 others 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnyb Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 1 hour ago, Addona said: Wasn't sure where to post this, but I just got this in the mail ... it looks fantastic! Thank you! At least one of your teams is having a good year! GasPed, JamesF, Unnamed Trialist and 5 others 4 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtlMario Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, johnyb said: At least one of your teams is having a good year! Reminds me of a joke I heard yesterday " What does the Titanic and the Habs have in common?" A. "Both are sitting at the bottom of the Atlantic." Kent, Xavier., Cheeta and 7 others 2 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Addona Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 2 hours ago, johnyb said: At least one of your teams is having a good year! I figured that was coming. I don't know who your NHL team is, but I'll throw out a "1967", just in case ... Trade Price to the Avs in the coming weeks, and grab Wright in the draft, and we'll be back in business! johnyb, gigi riva and GasPed 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigi riva Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 16 hours ago, Addona said: Wasn't sure where to post this, but I just got this in the mail ... it looks fantastic! Thank you! My two Favourite things The CNMT , and the Habs Addona, Sal333 and johnyb 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordan Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 Hoilett injured sebdeserio, Jedi Ram, Approve My Account Pls and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe MacCarthy Posted January 16, 2022 Share Posted January 16, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnyb Posted January 16, 2022 Share Posted January 16, 2022 On 1/14/2022 at 7:54 PM, Addona said: I figured that was coming. I don't know who your NHL team is, but I'll throw out a "1967", just in case ... Trade Price to the Avs in the coming weeks, and grab Wright in the draft, and we'll be back in business! Funny thing is I'm a Habs fan also. Bit of a shit show this year but they picked a good year to suck. Addona 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanMNT Memes Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 BuzzAndSting 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canadasoccer20 Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 Anyone have any idea when the roster for the next window will be announced? Usually its at the end of the week but like by now there is some rumours who have been called but haven't seen or heard much.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
narduch Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 32 minutes ago, canadasoccer20 said: Anyone have any idea when the roster for the next window will be announced? Usually its at the end of the week but like by now there is some rumours who have been called but haven't seen or heard much.. I think its been Friday for all the Octo windows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally McCoist Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 Thought I'd share this monumental partnership. narduch, PastPros, Club Linesman and 4 others 2 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
narduch Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 9 minutes ago, Ally McCoist said: Thought I'd share this monumental partnership. We really won't arrive until they announce their crypto partner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theaub Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 (edited) Hey if next Sunday's a go and I get the leading squeezable snack pouch made from 100% fruit for free, what a deal! Edited January 20, 2022 by theaub BuzzAndSting and chalms04 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal333 Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 56 minutes ago, Ally McCoist said: Thought I'd share this monumental partnership. What the hell is GoGo Squeez? I never heard of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtlMario Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 13 minutes ago, Sal333 said: What the hell is GoGo Squeez? I never heard of them. Go squeez them and you'll find out.😆 Sal333 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted January 20, 2022 Share Posted January 20, 2022 48 minutes ago, Sal333 said: What the hell is GoGo Squeez? I never heard of them. Now you have. Advertising works. masster and Ruffian 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now