Cheeta Posted February 5, 2019 Share Posted February 5, 2019 ^ Echo that. It's a good fit for all concerned. Say of it what you will but I'm quite sure the training field exposure a third 'keeper will receive on any CPL team will be far superior to anything they'd otherwise experience elsewhere. May serve them in very good stead should they continue in their footballing career. Hell, may even encourage them to give a footballing career a go. You never know. Keepers are funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xcalibre Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 On 2/4/2019 at 3:33 PM, Initial B said: It sounds like third keeper would be an ideal use for one of the USports slots. From a financial perspective, if not a development perspective. is Steph Labbé still in Calgary? DrummingInMySleep 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpg_29 Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 Grain of salt and all but: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackTheBlizzard Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 (edited) Another dude in the same thread: Edited April 9, 2019 by BringBackTheBlizzard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ams1984 Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 1 hour ago, BringBackTheBlizzard said: Another dude in the same thread: Got to start somewhere. It’s better to start from a position of caution, keep the overhead low, allow the clubs to prosper and get entrenched, and then raise or eventually eliminate the cap years from now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackTheBlizzard Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Ams1984 said: Got to start somewhere. It’s better to start from a position of caution, keep the overhead low, allow the clubs to prosper and get entrenched, and then raise or eventually eliminate the cap years from now. Agree with the strategy involved with the apparent low salary cap and the idea of making expansion into lots of small markets possible down the road, if all goes well. Think if you look at the rosters that have been assembled 750k seems on the high side for who has been signed so far but not drastically so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ansem Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 (edited) No one knows the salary cap but the league and ownership. Without a CBA, the league has the luxury to keep quiet, keep agents guessing and giving them the ability to push down the prices. With no obligations to talk salary, they'd have to be incredibly stupid businesswise to tell agents the real value of the cap, let alone trusting them to not leak it.... unless they are seeking to mislead them to lower their asking prices. We don't know and most likely won't know until a union gets in there. Edited April 9, 2019 by Ansem Unnamed Trialist 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpg_29 Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 11 minutes ago, Ansem said: No one knows the salary cap but the league and ownership. Without a CBA, the league has the luxury to keep quiet, keep agents guessing and giving them the ability to push down the prices. With no obligations to talk salary, they'd have to be incredibly stupid businesswise to tell agents the real value of the cap, let alone trusting them to not leak it.... unless they are seeking to mislead them to lower their asking prices. We don't know and most likely won't know until a union gets in there. Source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzie_the_parrot Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 https://nationalpost.com/sports/soccer/fc-edmonton/jones-canadian-premier-league-easier-on-wallet-for-fc-edmonton-owners/wcm/47a41d28-c7d4-4ea9-9c74-c720f3e3f506?video_autoplay=true ... But the real saving is going to be in player salaries. The CPL has a salary cap. To this point it hasn’t been made public, but I believe it to be between $600,000 and $750,000 a year. Maybe even less. Fath wouldn’t confirm my salary cap numbers either but he wasn’t avoiding the point of the discussion. “I will definitely say our salaries are significantly less.” ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex D Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 Does it matter? The quality of play is good, the football is exciting and the kids are getting a shot. That's all I could ask for. BuzzAndSting, Tigers, gator and 7 others 9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unnamed Trialist Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 On 4/9/2019 at 6:04 PM, mpg_29 said: Grain of salt and all but: If it was a player agent, he was obvious told a figure lower than the reality, for a simple reason (as many have already explained here): you never tell a player agent how much you have to spend, or anything to make him think his player is making something below the median. For example, 750k divided by a roster of 23 gives you just over 32,000 per player. The agent thinks: "no way my guy is going to sign for less than the median". Unless the agents are all sharing information and have pooled their information services, which they might be in part, but most likely that is not reliable information. Ansem 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youllneverwalkalone Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 At some point, once you've caught all those kids who would have otherwise fallen through the cracks, I think you want to majority of your 7 internationals to be close to CMNT calibre. I think you also want a league minimum of around $50k. This will probably mean a cap between $2-3m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ansem Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Ozzie_the_parrot said: https://nationalpost.com/sports/soccer/fc-edmonton/jones-canadian-premier-league-easier-on-wallet-for-fc-edmonton-owners/wcm/47a41d28-c7d4-4ea9-9c74-c720f3e3f506?video_autoplay=true ... But the real saving is going to be in player salaries. The CPL has a salary cap. To this point it hasn’t been made public, but I believe it to be between $600,000 and $750,000 a year. Maybe even less. Fath wouldn’t confirm my salary cap numbers either but he wasn’t avoiding the point of the discussion. “I will definitely say our salaries are significantly less.” ... You do know that as an owner, it's 1000% in his own best interest to low ball that figure as much as possible, right? If anything, CPL are paying most players at or below market value, and keeping everyone in the dark is one crucial way to achieve that. Edited May 11, 2019 by Ansem Bbeto 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grasshopper1917 Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 12 minutes ago, youllneverwalkalone said: At some point, once you've caught all those kids who would have otherwise fallen through the cracks, I think you want to majority of your 7 internationals to be close to CMNT calibre. I think you also want a league minimum of around $50k. This will probably mean a cap between $2-3m. Yea at 'some point' we are no where remotely close to being there. Id say that's a 10-20 year goal. Ozzie_the_parrot 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzie_the_parrot Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 11 minutes ago, Ansem said: You do know that as an owner, it's 1000% in his own best interest to low ball that figure as much as possible, right? If anything, CPL are paying most players at or below market value, and keeping everyone in the dark is one crucial way to achieve that. Tom Fath made a huge fuss over the business plan having to be sustainable before FCE would come back, so I think it runs a bit deeper than that. The first few games have demonstrated that they can achieve a watchable level of soccer without going crazy on salaries with heavily Canadian rosters. A low salary cap is a positive for the league because if they can make it work on somewhere in the 500-750k range on player salaries then expansion into a lot of 200k + markets should be very much viable as stadium solutions are identified and the league is likely to hang around. It was the higher salary caps that some on here craved that were likely to lead to a negative outcome for the league. The Real Marc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ansem Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 11 minutes ago, Ozzie_the_parrot said: Tom Fath made a huge fuss over the business plan having to be sustainable before FCE would come back, so I think it runs a bit deeper than that. The first few games have demonstrated that they can achieve a watchable level of soccer without going crazy on salaries with heavily Canadian rosters. A low salary cap is a positive for the league because if they can make it work on somewhere in the 500-750k range on player salaries then expansion into a lot of 200k + markets should be very much viable as stadium solutions are identified and the league is likely to hang around. It was the higher salary caps that some on here craved that were likely to lead to a negative outcome for the league. My point is simply that, we don't know what it is. No one expected MLS level salaries. The fact that they can pay at value or lower the Canadian talent that are offering a good level of football is a very big positive for the league. When their contracts are up, they will either get a pay raise, be sold or transferred. Buy low, sell high. Good move. The cap will go up over time, not really that relevant what it is on year 1, the level of play was what mattered and they are doing well there. It's a plus they can do that on low salaries. Add chemistry over time and the quality will just keep going up. That's really what's important Bbeto 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchmen Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 20 hours ago, Ansem said: My point is simply that, we don't know what it is. No one expected MLS level salaries. The fact that they can pay at value or lower the Canadian talent that are offering a good level of football is a very big positive for the league. When their contracts are up, they will either get a pay raise, be sold or transferred. Buy low, sell high. Good move. The cap will go up over time, not really that relevant what it is on year 1, the level of play was what mattered and they are doing well there. It's a plus they can do that on low salaries. Add chemistry over time and the quality will just keep going up. That's really what's important I'm not disagreeing with your overall point, but keep in mind that when they're contracts are up they can't be sold/transferred. They're free to go where they want. So it would be a case of either giving them a raise, losing them for nothing, or selling them before their contracts expire. At this stage, I think if a team gets the chance to sell a player on (regardless of the amount), they should take it. It would be great to be able to demonstrate to players "look, we can help you develop and get you to a higher level". Ansem and Ams1984 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fil Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 (edited) Wonder who is the highest paid in the league? Both De Jong and Petrasso were making around 150 000 US last year in MLS. By the way the minimum in MLS last year was about 55 000, this is what Didic was at. Edited May 13, 2019 by fil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fil Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 Instead of bringing a DP rule, would prefer to see the league help in some way the bottom feeding teams (Valour/Pacific) to increase competitiveness. DP's favors teams that are already well off as it is. Would not be surprised if a option for a DP was introduced, only Forge and Cavalry would use it creating a further separation from the good teams and the bad teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonovision Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 I don't think that Valour and Pacific are spending less money than Forge or Cavalry or the rest of the league, nor are they less deep-pocketed than other ownership groups. Lofty, Reign and Unnamed Trialist 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
narduch Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 (edited) I'm not really sure where I stand on this. I might be ok with one such player per team. Of course the CPL would need to come up with its own nomenclature. Can't call it DP. But please don't start introducing things like TAM and GAM and allocation. It's a joke when you see MLS teams make trades involving no players Edited August 14, 2019 by narduch CDNFootballer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaFan123 Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 The CPL chiefs would be wise to recognize their competitive advantage to MLS. CPL has a chance to differentiate and to be organic. If we start using MLS rules people may as well support MLS. Kent and jonovision 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpursFlu Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 (edited) I totally agree. I think the CPL should avoid a salary cap and a dp rule. Perhaps internally have certain understandings but overtly I don't want to know about it. All this money talk is discouraging and distracting when it comes to other sports. I think it turns off fans. Just let the play speak for itself Edited August 14, 2019 by SpursFlu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonovision Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 I think a salary cap is fine, and probably necessary in a fledgling league, but like you say there is no need to have every financial detail public. This is something the CFL gets mostly right: it's a capped league with no DPs but we're not inundated with a bunch of cap geek style punditry that is a big part of NBA, NHL and NFL coverage. Ams1984 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aird25 Posted August 14, 2019 Share Posted August 14, 2019 17 minutes ago, CanadaFan123 said: The CPL chiefs would be wise to recognize their competitive advantage to MLS. CPL has a chance to differentiate and to be organic. If we start using MLS rules people may as well support MLS. So you're saying it's a competitive advantage to differentiate ourselves from MLS by copying traditional leagues? Why? I would honestly prefer if the league moved away from a salary cap and a avoided a DP rule. I think they make for a much less honest competition. But having different roster regulations from MLS is not the reason that Canadians should support this league. We should support the league because it's ours and because of the leagues commitment to Canadian players, coaches, fans, cities... Bbeto 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now