Jump to content

General Discussion on Canadian Youth Teams


Recommended Posts

We just witness how little senior players actually care about youth players (men and women)

It's like the whole boomers vs millennial generational rivalry all over again.

Disappointing and we can't be surprised that so many very promising dual players end up representing another country 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Ansem said:

We just witness how little senior players actually care about youth players (men and women)

It's like the whole boomers vs millennial generational rivalry all over again.

Disappointing and we can't be surprised that so many very promising dual players end up representing another country 

Would this not also apply to other nations as well? Think it comes down to a lack of trust from the perspective of the Cdn players....that money "left on the table" would be spent appropriately, such as youth development vs going into the general slush fund, similar to  Federal EI premiums and  Ontario health taxes  :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Ansem said:

We just witness how little senior players actually care about youth players (men and women)

It's like the whole boomers vs millennial generational rivalry all over again.

Disappointing and we can't be surprised that so many very promising dual players end up representing another country 

These guys have careers with a finite amount of time to earn their money before it’s all over. Of course they don’t care about youth teams. My guess is it’s even worse in other countries. You think guys playing for France with a market value of €100M care about the U16s?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, InglewoodJack said:

These guys have careers with a finite amount of time to earn their money before it’s all over. Of course they don’t care about youth teams. My guess is it’s even worse in other countries. You think guys playing for France with a market value of €100M care about the U16s?

I 100% understand what youre saying and alot of these bonuses make a huge difference for some of our players. However, its common for players to donate the money the make from the national team. The french players may not care about giving back to the u16's but they dont have to because money isnt a problem for the french federation. I did read that lots of french players were donating their salaries. 

Its interesting that if the men and women share the 10million, each player gets 192k PRE tax. But realistically they are asking for alot by wanting even 80% (153k). Now if the players accepted 50% they would essentially be giving up 50-60k pretax dollars. 50k is obviously alot of money for normal people but to put our federation at risk with strikes etc for 50k seems disproportional. 

I'd say that any player making under 500k a year can reasonably say that 50k will make a difference. Who is that on our WC roster. 
Fraser, waterman, cornelius, pantemis spoony, millar, Kone before his move, miller before his move?, vitoria?

So roughly 9/25 guys could be impacted by the bonus. Within the 9 guys, I would assume the 50k is anywhere from 10-50% of annual salary. Again to put the federation at risk for a 10% salary bonus seems quite extreme and only justifiable for the very very low end players who quite frankly are not important enough to the program to put it at risk. 

This tells me that the players were also heavily motivated to help canada soccer because the CSB deal is "so horrible". The strike is to get more money for themselves from the WC and for CSA from CSB. 

If the men didnt go on strike, would the women? I doubt it.

This basically means that rick westhead reporting has completely toppled our soccer federation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bigandy said:

I 100% understand what youre saying and alot of these bonuses make a huge difference for some of our players. However, its common for players to donate the money the make from the national team. The french players may not care about giving back to the u16's but they dont have to because money isnt a problem for the french federation. I did read that lots of french players were donating their salaries. 

Its interesting that if the men and women share the 10million, each player gets 192k PRE tax. But realistically they are asking for alot by wanting even 80% (153k). Now if the players accepted 50% they would essentially be giving up 50-60k pretax dollars. 50k is obviously alot of money for normal people but to put our federation at risk with strikes etc for 50k seems disproportional. 

I'd say that any player making under 500k a year can reasonably say that 50k will make a difference. Who is that on our WC roster. 
Fraser, waterman, cornelius, pantemis spoony, millar, Kone before his move, miller before his move?, vitoria?

So roughly 9/25 guys could be impacted by the bonus. Within the 9 guys, I would assume the 50k is anywhere from 10-50% of annual salary. Again to put the federation at risk for a 10% salary bonus seems quite extreme and only justifiable for the very very low end players who quite frankly are not important enough to the program to put it at risk. 

This tells me that the players were also heavily motivated to help canada soccer because the CSB deal is "so horrible". The strike is to get more money for themselves from the WC and for CSA from CSB. 

If the men didnt go on strike, would the women? I doubt it.

This basically means that rick westhead reporting has completely toppled our soccer federation.

I don't know if all the french team donated their salaries- I know Mbappe donated his 2018 earnings, but Davies also donated his 2022 earnings. Not sure who our next highest paid players are- Jonathan David earns around 1,7M EUR gross, Larin around 800K, don't think anyone else out earns them. You have to remember that players take home a fraction of their wages. There's probably like 50% taxes, 5% to the agent, another 10% or so to escrow, a few points to your lawyer, your trainer, your publicist, union fees, and really, you're likely cashing in around 35-40% of that cheque. If you take JD's salary, from that 1.7M, he's realistically seeing around 600-700k EUR in his bank account, which yes, is still around $1M CAD, and he does get sponsorship dollars (Again, subject to fees), but even for a player like him, the NT earnings you're talking about are like 10% of his salary. If my boss was threatening to take 10% of my paycheck by revoking my bonus, yes I would want to strike. I would want to shut down the entire office, because that's my money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, InglewoodJack said:

I don't know if all the french team donated their salaries- I know Mbappe donated his 2018 earnings, but Davies also donated his 2022 earnings. Not sure who our next highest paid players are- Jonathan David earns around 1,7M EUR gross, Larin around 800K, don't think anyone else out earns them. You have to remember that players take home a fraction of their wages. There's probably like 50% taxes, 5% to the agent, another 10% or so to escrow, a few points to your lawyer, your trainer, your publicist, union fees, and really, you're likely cashing in around 35-40% of that cheque. If you take JD's salary, from that 1.7M, he's realistically seeing around 600-700k EUR in his bank account, which yes, is still around $1M CAD, and he does get sponsorship dollars (Again, subject to fees), but even for a player like him, the NT earnings you're talking about are like 10% of his salary. If my boss was threatening to take 10% of my paycheck by revoking my bonus, yes I would want to strike. I would want to shut down the entire office, because that's my money.

Your math isnt apples to apples. 

So lets say that he pulls in 1 Million a year post tax from his club salary only. 

The CSA is basically arguing over a 50k difference. This is pretax. With your math, he only gets 35-40% But at minimum he gets a 50% tax. we can call it 17.5- 25k. That is 1.7%- 2.5%. 

Another way of looking at it, is that your boss offers you a 1.7%-2.5% bonus but you were hoping for 3.4-5%. Are you going to go on strike for a disagreement over 1.7-2.5% of a bonus. Now lets further that... This isnt the main job of the players. Its an honor to represent your country. Youre inspiring kids and a nation. Its a not for profit organization. Its so much bigger than a job. Are you really going to negatively impact that because you expected a slightly bigger bonus than the bonus you got.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Bigandy said:

Your math isnt apples to apples. 

So lets say that he pulls in 1 Million a year post tax from his club salary only. 

The CSA is basically arguing over a 50k difference. This is pretax. With your math, he only gets 35-40% But at minimum he gets a 50% tax. we can call it 17.5- 25k. That is 1.7%- 2.5%. 

Another way of looking at it, is that your boss offers you a 1.7%-2.5% bonus but you were hoping for 3.4-5%. Are you going to go on strike for a disagreement over 1.7-2.5% of a bonus. Now lets further that... This isnt the main job of the players. It’s an honor to represent your country. Youre inspiring kids and a nation. It’s a not for profit organization. It’s so much bigger than a job. Are you really going to negatively impact that because you expected a slightly bigger bonus than the bonus you got.  

If my boss chopped my bonus in half, I’d brush up my CV, get a competing offer, and force my employer to match or lose me. National team players don’t have this leverage, so they strike. 
 

We can look at playing for the national team as some honour and players should do this out of a sense of patriotism and to be a role model for the youths etc., but since none of us were born yesterday, we know this isn’t the case. We know your international career is directly tied to your club career. We know players sacrifice their vacation, long travel hours, etc., to make international games. It isn’t “much” but these are the players who have for all intents and purposes made the national team what it is today. Canada needs Jonathan David and Alphonso Davies and so on more than they need the national team. 
 

A player is a business. It’s bad business to leave money on the table, especially when the other party was effectively made by your efforts. We can pretend that these superstars play for their national team out of a sense of patriotic pride, but we know that isn’t the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, InglewoodJack said:

If my boss chopped my bonus in half, I’d brush up my CV, get a competing offer, and force my employer to match or lose me. National team players don’t have this leverage, so they strike. 
 

We can look at playing for the national team as some honour and players should do this out of a sense of patriotism and to be a role model for the youths etc., but since none of us were born yesterday, we know this isn’t the case. We know your international career is directly tied to your club career. We know players sacrifice their vacation, long travel hours, etc., to make international games. It isn’t “much” but these are the players who have for all intents and purposes made the national team what it is today. Canada needs Jonathan David and Alphonso Davies and so on more than they need the national team. 
 

A player is a business. It’s bad business to leave money on the table, especially when the other party was effectively made by your efforts. We can pretend that these superstars play for their national team out of a sense of patriotic pride, but we know that isn’t the case.

But that isnt what happened. Their boss didnt chop the bonus in half. The players want double the bonus offered. Thats a huge difference. How much do the players deserve of the 10million. Thats the whole debate. Its not like they were promised it all and then had it taken away. 

If you had an amazing paying job and then you also did paid volunteering on the side and your paid volunteer job gave you a 1% bonus, but you expected 2%, would you strike? 

I 100% disagree that playing for the national team is not an honour. Guys like david are not playing for canada for the money. David probably could make more if he opted for the USA. So he clearly chose less money to play for a country he cares about. Davies donating his canada salary shows hes playing for canada for non financial reasons. Like you say, canada needs them more than they need canada so why would they put themselves through all the negatives unless there is patriotism, honor, inspiring youth etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
6 hours ago, yomurphy1 said:

Coaches kid plays for another country... I like Herdman but can't pretend this doesn't grate me.

His father selects our roster. I am positive when he is good enough to play for us he will, provided Herdman the elder doesn’t have an unexpected acrimonious exit from the CANMNT 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me make sure I have this straight. Mitrovic's and Flores' fathers interfere too much by influencing the choice their kids make, but Jay Herdman's father isn't interfering enough. Both are despicable, immoral acts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...