Jump to content

Match Thread: October 14, 2023 - Playoffs - First Semifinal (1v2) - Cavalry v Forge


narduch

Recommended Posts

So that is tricky for Cavalry to have to sit at home and try to get it right next week. 

Pacific is probably a step below but after these two tight wins and three games in a week, they get to rest better this week, and then go back to Calgary. Where they lost last time. I think it'll be more even that we might think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

So that is tricky for Cavalry to have to sit at home and try to get it right next week. 

Pacific is probably a step below but after these two tight wins and three games in a week, they get to rest better this week, and then go back to Calgary. Where they lost last time. I think it'll be more even that we might think.

Aye. Cavs will be feeling little dejected with the potential for the bottling stigma and doubt settling in while Pacific will be in the ascendancy, buoyed by two wins when they were trending badly backwards. 

Will the extra week be of benefit or not for Forge. We shall see. Home advantage is always nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, jonovision said:

Forge's ongoing success is good for Forge. I don't know what good it is to the rest of the CPL.

It's a standard the rest of the league needs to learn to respond to. 

Forge has good rosters, similar to Cavalry and Pacific I'd say, but is not unbeatable. It is not clearly privileged or anything, though I agree it's not an underdog. This year in fact another team has already lifted a trophy, they haven't. They also lost a league at home once, quite clearly too.

Real Madrid won the first 5 European Cups. It took 30 years for another club to win that many. Or another example: Rosenborg won Norway 13 years straight, 92-2004… and Rosenborg is in only the fourth largest city in Norway, rather inconveniently located too. Dynasties happen, but they also have droughts. We'll look back in 15-20 years and see this in CPL. Maybe Forge's drought starts this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

It's a standard the rest of the league needs to learn to respond to. 

Forge has good rosters, similar to Cavalry and Pacific I'd say, but is not unbeatable. It is not clearly privileged or anything, though I agree it's not an underdog. This year in fact another team has already lifted a trophy, they haven't. They also lost a league at home once, quite clearly too.

Real Madrid won the first 5 European Cups. It took 30 years for another club to win that many. Or another example: Rosenborg won Norway 13 years straight, 92-2004… and Rosenborg is in only the fourth largest city in Norway, rather inconveniently located too. Dynasties happen, but they also have droughts. We'll look back in 15-20 years and see this in CPL. Maybe Forge's drought starts this year.

It's hardly the fault of Forge, but this is a league, half a decade old, where half of the existing teams have experienced no meaningful on field success. This can only go so long without a cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jonovision said:

It's hardly the fault of Forge, but this is a league, half a decade old, where half of the existing teams have experienced no meaningful on field success. This can only go so long without a cost.

Okay, I'm relieved that the idea isn't that Forge need to be worse for the league to succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

It's a standard the rest of the league needs to learn to respond to. 

Forge has good rosters, similar to Cavalry and Pacific I'd say, but is not unbeatable. It is not clearly privileged or anything, though I agree it's not an underdog. This year in fact another team has already lifted a trophy, they haven't. They also lost a league at home once, quite clearly too.

Real Madrid won the first 5 European Cups. It took 30 years for another club to win that many. Or another example: Rosenborg won Norway 13 years straight, 92-2004… and Rosenborg is in only the fourth largest city in Norway, rather inconveniently located too. Dynasties happen, but they also have droughts. We'll look back in 15-20 years and see this in CPL. Maybe Forge's drought starts this year.

Except it's a league (similar to MLS) designed not to have dynasties.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not blaming Forge for this.  And to be fair, it's also what happened in MLS: DC United won 3 of the first 4 MLS Cups.  I'm simply saying that sometimes more established leagues can take the hit of a team building a dynasty for a time (though 13 years by Rosenborg, 9 years recently by Juventus, and 11 and counting currently by Bayern are a bit ridiculous).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I meant is Forge’s relative success and ability to be competitive beyond the CPL  has to add some validity to the league. Plus yeah they force the league theoretically to raise their standards. 
 

But yeah not great for the other teams and also I loathe them for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jonovision said:

It's hardly the fault of Forge, but this is a league, half a decade old, where half of the existing teams have experienced no meaningful on field success. This can only go so long without a cost.

How about the Canadian Stanley Cup drought? What has been the terrible, devastating cost for the sport in Canada not having a winner since I watched Keon and Horton win it when I was a kid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...