El Hombre Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 Ignorant /iɡnərənt/ (adjective): lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular. It's not necessarily a slam. More of a statement of fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob.notenboom Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 10 minutes ago, amanfromvancouver said: I am not a member of this group; clearly I would be kicked out ! No see that's another thing you don't get. There's really no pre-req for being a Voyageur, not even being in step with the deeply entrenched hegemony around here. You have a profile on the forum so you've already made your choice. You're a V now, like it or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theaub Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 2 hours ago, El Hombre said: Follow-up Question #2: How annoyed will the other Vees I know be that they didn't make an appearance? Really the only question here is what did I look like? This could go anywhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hombre Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 3 minutes ago, theaub said: Really the only question here is what did I look like? This could go anywhere You looked vaguely like my Grade 12 Calculus teacher. I assume that is incredibly accurate. My dreams are prophetic like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shermanator Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 I'm offended I was not in this dream! Is there no room for a sophisticated sex robot who travels back in time, to change the future, for one lucky lady? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 Are we allowed to call Hitler names or would that be too mean? Your point of view is extremely idiotic and ignorant which justifies being called an "idiot" or "ignorant". Why are you called ignorant? Well judging from your past 200 comments you don't know any better. If you post your point of view on any other site you would get the same reactions. It's like going across the world and asking if murder is okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob.notenboom Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 3 hours ago, El Hombre said: Follow-up Question #2: How annoyed will the other Vees I know be that they didn't make an appearance? Colour me disappointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hombre Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 12 minutes ago, shermanator said: I'm offended I was not in this dream! Is there no room for a sophisticated sex robot who travels back in time, to change the future, for one lucky lady? Oh shit, that was you?!? You were definitely a big part of the dream's "B" story. Sorry, I guess I just didn't recognize you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hombre Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 5 minutes ago, rob.notenboom said: Colour me disappointed. Sorry dude. I once worked with a Notenboom (except he spelled it Nootenboom) and I've tried to scrub that name from my sub-conscious. Change your name and we'll see what happens. I suggest Heathcliff McSaskatchewan. /thread officially derailed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob.notenboom Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 9 minutes ago, El Hombre said: Sorry dude. I once worked with a Notenboom (except he spelled it Nootenboom) and I've tried to scrub that name from my sub-conscious. Change your name and we'll see what happens. I suggest Heathcliff McSaskatchewan. /thread officially derailed Johann MacFlatlander? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 1 hour ago, rob.notenboom said: No see that's another thing you don't get. There's really no pre-req for being a Voyageur, not even being in step with the deeply entrenched hegemony around here. You have a profile on the forum so you've already made your choice. You're a V now, like it or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squizz1402635577 Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 4 hours ago, El Hombre said: Follow-up Question: How creeped out will those Vees be to know that they appeared in a dream of mine last night? Mentioning me is bullying, and your exclusion of other V's in your dream is discrimination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shorty Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 Sorry, wrong room. Thought this was a thread on the El Salvador game. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amanfromvancouver Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 If I am now one of you, can I call a guy a vile name because I don't agree with him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddoouugg Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 2 minutes ago, amanfromvancouver said: If I am now one of you, can I call a guy a vile name because I don't agree with him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olympique_de_Marseille Posted April 16, 2016 Author Share Posted April 16, 2016 13 minutes ago, amanfromvancouver said: If I am now one of you, can I call a guy a vile name because I don't agree with him? Sure! Try this one: "El Hombre is a Rob Friend supporter who hates our national teams so much he probably won't show up to see the WNT play in Ottawa, because more important things like "family" got in the way." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob.notenboom Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 47 minutes ago, amanfromvancouver said: If I am now one of you, can I call a guy a vile name because I don't agree with him? Of course! In fact by saying all Vs think the same, you've already been doing that for a while now. Clearly you belong. But the difficult thing is, since all Vs agree and you are a V, you are also disagreeing with the fact that you agree. When this paradox becomes more apparent it will cause many robots' heads to explode, drastically thinning our numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smiddy Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 I have to say this has been a very pleasant Saturday morning breakfast read. Please keep it coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperCanuck Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 On 12 April, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Blue and White Army said: If the match is in Vancouver again, my suggestion is that we attempt to keep non-participants (those not interested in chanting) out of the "core" Vees' section (whether that's in the front or wherever), as they really watered down the atmosphere two weeks ago. I've honestly never been in such a quiet Vees' section; however, the sold-out stadium supposedly compensated for that, lending to a good overall atmosphere. Lots of people there who understood what the section was about and wanted to be there, but completely uninterested in contributing. Somehow, we need to clarify at the point of ticket sale that participation is an expectation in the core area. Those there to merely watch and "soak up the atmosphere" can stand at the back or adjacent to wherever the "core" area is. Efforts were made last time to "tape off" (using caution tape) the front areas for hardcore support, yet over at one side of the section (near the players' tunnel) it was filled with passive people. Need to find a better way to communicate that "front = participation." My two cents. While we're on the subject of atmosphere during the last game, I'll add my two cents as well. I asked about the choice of location of the V's after the Honduras match, but to my recollection it was never answered. The same thing happened for the Mexico match, so I'll ask again: Is there a reason the V's are huddled in the corner nearest the TV cameras so they're not really visible most of the time? The corner on the other side of the tunnel is much more visible throughout the game. Is the V's section going to be in that same corner once again for the El Salvador match? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 2 hours ago, rob.notenboom said: Of course! In fact by saying all Vs think the same, you've already been doing that for a while now. Clearly you belong. But the difficult thing is, since all Vs agree and you are a V, you are also disagreeing with the fact that you agree. When this paradox becomes more apparent it will cause many robots' heads to explode, drastically thinning our numbers. He'll soon start self-loathing for being a conformist and troll himself with multiple sock accounts.....Then one day he'll wake up in a strange hotel room with a list of phone calls his socks made, fly around the country chasing after them almost getting his junk cut off, realize he blew up his own condo and has been sleeping with Helena Bonham Carter....oh and then fight himself and then...wait, better not spoil it for others... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unnamed Trialist Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 6 hours ago, amanfromvancouver said: I am not a member of this group; clearly I would be kicked out ! You are a member of the deadbet soccer ruling class, trying to snuff out those little sprouts of resistance the Voyageurs represent. We've dealt with your kind before, you'll fail. In fact, thankfully, you are failing. And soccer is winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smiddy Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 As for atmosphere. Maybe we spread out in groups of 10 or 20 throughout the stadium. Really disturb the peace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Hombre Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 48 minutes ago, jpg75 said: He'll soon start self-loathing for being a conformist and troll himself with multiple sock accounts.....Then one day he'll wake up in a strange hotel room with a list of phone calls his socks made, fly around the country chasing after them almost getting his junk cut off, realize he blew up his own condo and has been sleeping with Helena Bonham Carter....oh and then fight himself and then...wait, better not spoil it for others... Do you remember the name of the poster that was very similar to this during the Dale Mitchell WCQ? This is oddly reminiscent. He even started his own Soccer Supporters board. That was sweet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amanfromvancouver Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 1 hour ago, Unnamed Trialist said: You are a member of the deadbet soccer ruling class, trying to snuff out those little sprouts of resistance the Voyageurs represent. We've dealt with your kind before, you'll fail. In fact, thankfully, you are failing. And soccer is winning. This is utter trash. This organization is just a bunch of bullies You won't escape that. You want to ban people who don't think like you, kick them out of your section in a public stadium, you name it. This is not something the CSA should be proud of. I dont get why we have to argue about it. I just want to talk canadian soccer on the forum, not this dog and pony show about discrimination. Why can't you fellas just talk and disagree without name calling and telling people to leave and multi man gang attacks trying to shut me out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 4 minutes ago, amanfromvancouver said: This is utter trash. This organization is just a bunch of bullies You won't escape that. You want to ban people who don't think like you, kick them out of your section in a public stadium, you name it. This is not something the CSA should be proud of. You clearly don't understand the concept of devoted supporters sections do you? The point is to make noise. ff they don't make a lot of noise what is the point of having the section? Also your first point does not make sense because if this website banned those with differing radical opinions you would have been kicked out after your first 5 posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.