Jump to content
  • CONCACAF says no (and who they might say no to next)

    The Ottawa Fury appear to have lost the game of chicken that they were playing against CONCACAF and the CSA. Yesterday, the club announced that they would not be allowed to play in the US-based USL for 2019. This is despite receiving a tepid approval from the CSA in September, when they refused to become founding members of the CanPL.

    This leaves the Fury in a difficult position just four months out from the start of the season. However, according to multiple people working inside the game, they shouldn’t be surprised.

    “They knew this was possible,” one source said. “Yet, they went ahead anyway and now they are crying about being discriminated.”

    Another person went even further, suggesting that the Fury might have “half wanted (to be denied sanctioning).” The suggestion being that OSEG doesn’t really want to be involved in soccer anymore, but didn’t want to be the bad guy in fans’ eyes, least it hurt them with RedBlacks’ ticket sales.

    What happened yesterday was predicted by many. In a Sept 6 article on CSN I quoted a source suggesting that this was a distinct possibility.

    “Who is going to sanction them,” they said at the time “They may get a ‘pity’ sanction for 2019, but beyond that?”

    Another person speculated that the CSA would be reluctant to directly challenge the Fury, but would work behind closed doors to challenge the legitimacy of the club playing in a US-based league.

    “They won’t say anything publicly, but they are hoping CONCACAF steps in,” they said at the time.

    We don’t know if CONCACAF is acting on behalf of the CSA, but CONCACAF did in fact step in.

    The question now is what happens next. Most still believe a temporary sanctioning for 2019 will come through, but only with the understanding that this will be the final year it is permitted. Will the Fury continue with that understanding? For the sake of the fans, let’s hope so. But, relations between the CanPL and the Fury weren’t great already and, although there is no direct link between the CanPL and CONCACAF denying sanctioning, yesterday didn’t help the relationship improve.

    Beyond the Fury, yesterday’s decision could have a trickle down impact on Canadian soccer. If CONCACAF is to enforce the policy evenly, you would have to think that USL-2 teams (formerly PDL) will be the next to be targeted.  The rule being referenced in the Fury’s case states that no team is allowed to play in a league outside its country if a league of the same standard is available in their country. Clearly, CONCACAF has concluded that CanPL is equal to USL.

    But, is League1 Ontario and the PLSQ the same as USL2?

    It’s long been the desire of the CSA to stop teams at the D3 level from playing out of country in the hope that the provinces would step up and start D3 leagues. So far only two have, which has allowed several D3 teams to ignore that desire and play in the US.

    With the CanPL buying L1O, there is speculation that the plan is to bring that model to all parts of the country. When that happens, you would expect that the existing D3 teams be asked to return to Canada. Anyone operating a D3 team now would be wise to plan ahead with this in mind.

    Which brings us to the MLS teams. Many fans will not accept the rational that they should be exempt from this. In the interest of “fairness” it will be argued that they too should be forced to join CanPL.

    It won’t happen, but it will create some bad optics for the CSA. The reason it won’t happen now is because it’s clear that forcing TFC, IMFC and VWFC out of MLS would be negative for player development and soccer culture in the country. That would be counter to the entire purpose of creating the CanPL.

    Although many USL fans strongly disagree, that league is not viewed as having a net benefit to the country and thus is fair game here.   

    Will this eventually change? Is there a scenario where the three MLS teams are required to enter the CanPL.

    Yes. And possibly sooner than most believe.

    (That is if one or more of the Canadian MLS teams isn’t part of a bigger league by then – a league that is launched as part of the United 2026 bid and is designed to disrupt the established order of world football. But, that’s a topic for another day).   

    Edited by Duane Rollins

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • CANMNT_CNL_Toronto_Carousel.jpg

  • Posts

    • I like that pitch. My son has played a few matches there as a visitor. It has a track, which is one of the only drawbacks from a venue that otherwise has a bit of that Swangard charm about it: 
    • Recap for Jan 25th:   ENGLAND Premier League 2 (U23) Ben Paton had the start for Blackburn Rovers today, going the full 90' in a 1-1 draw to Man City. This match marked Rovers' return to play since the Covid pause, with the draw being Ben's first game since November 6th after he suffered an injury in a 6-0 loss to Arsenal on that day.   ITALY Primavera (U19) Simon Colyn was an unused sub for SPAL today, as they handed Roma their first defeat of the Primavera season in a 1-0 win.   SERBIA Friendlies Milan Borjan had the start for Crvena zvezda, rotating out in the 66th minute for a 1-0 win away at Russian club Ufa.
    • Where is this self-defeating weak and soft Canadian "politeness" coming from? Of all the F'N domestic cups in the world where part-timers in the 6th division gives their all to compete against an EPL clubs or top tier club - Only in F'N Canada you'd find fans who'd imply that lower seeded teams should just stay home. F me...
    • I have doubts it's that simple.  There's a 4 date FIFA window in June and the Gold Cup takes place afterward in July.  The Gold Cup is outside the FIFA window and can only mandate player release due to its status as a Confederation Championship.  Think of AFCON that's played in January outside of FIFA dates but player release is still mandated.  If the Gold Cup is replaced with more qualifiers, would the same player release rules apply?  I'm not certain they would because now you're talking about qualifiers played outside of a FIFA window as opposed to a Confederation Championship with mandatory release.    
    • Think we could see something like last year: the 3 Canadian MLS teams start with a series against each other before going on the road to the US for a bit, with everyone hoping the vaccination roll out gets the border situation resolved and teams are able to cross later this year.
    • Altitude FC is backed by Faly Academy Both Men's and Women's Teams Season runs between May to July League is run by BC Soccer and is positioned just below CanPL Branding & Club Name have been developed  Minimum of 6 U23 players on the field Maximum of 6 pro players per team Maximum salary of $5000 per pro ($30,000 total) Maximum of 3 import players (non-Canadian) Source: https://www.cnv.org/your-government/council-meetings (January 25 2021 agenda pack)
    • Will it though? With the World Cup not until late November, why would it detract from an event 4 months earlier? If they were both in July ... then sure. But I don't think anyone will be thinking about the months-away World Cup during the Olympcs.
    • Will they want to though? They have no realistic chance of advancing - is it worth their while to put a squad together months before they'd need to, to play a closed-door, perhaps not even televised, match - particularly when they are going to be playing 2021 CONACAF League and hopefully Voyageurs Cup matches this summer. If it were I, I'd be sticking up my hand and saying pass.
    • Is Doneil actually injured? I thought the post about the ACL was supposed to be a joke.
  • Create New...