Jump to content
  • What to do about Ottawa


    Duane Rollins

    Multiple sources in the CanPL and in Canadian soccer have confirmed that the Ottawa Fury will struggle to be sanctioned after 2019, if not sooner.

    “Who is going to sanction them,” one source said? “They may get a ‘pity’ sanction for 2019, but beyond that?”

    Another person working in the game suggested that the CSA will be reluctant to directly challenge the Fury, but that they are working behind closed doors to challenge the legitimacy of the club playing in the US-based USL.

    “They won’t say anything publicly, but they are hoping CONCACAF steps in.”

    The suggestion is that CONCACAF may ban teams outside the top flight from participating in leagues outside their country. This would be in reaction to not just the Canadian situation, but also in the Caribbean where several teams have attached themselves to US leagues now and in the past. There is a movement within CONCACAF to create a D1 pan-Caribbean league and having clubs play in the US makes that more challenging. This could offer an opportunity to stop the practice moving forward.

    It’s also difficult to justify the three Canadian MLS teams, if you ban teams from below the top flight. Especially if, as the CSA has suggested, the CanPL is launched as a Division 1 league. It would seem that at the very least you would need to acknowledge that CanPL is a D2 league, if you were to allow TFC, the Whitecaps and Impact to remain in the American league, while barring Ottawa entry into USL.  

    Not everyone believes the CSA is ready to take the so-called “nuclear option” of denying sanctioning. There is a significant amount of people that are hoping that the Fury can be convinced to join the league, although everyone I spoke to today agrees that the likelihood of that happening for 2019 is close to zero.

    Regardless, it is clear that the idea that the CSA and CanPL are supportive of the Fury’s choice, as has been reported in Ottawa, is completely false. It is possible that the Fury will be allowed to play 2019 in USL, but it will not be with the blessing of the governing body. The best the Fury can hope for is the CSA’s silence.

    More tomorrow…


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Yes, I could see a "pity" exemption for 2019 but beyond that, I too hope that CONCACAF would step in but yes, at the same time, it would perhaps be necessary for the CSA to alter the recognition of the league to 1A to open the door for the CONCACAF. Second Division could be damaging.

    Edited by Blizzard
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Please sign in to comment

    You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



    Sign In Now

  • Image from iOS.jpg

  • Posts

    • Ahhh didn't realize they were playing at home, was just thinking they'd play on the weekend. Mind you, anyone north of the river (you know, the city the team is named for) driving through rush hour traffic to get to a weeknight game was probably unrealistic Now that they're winning though I might as well hop on the bandwagon
    • It'll take a bigger name than Bobby or Tommy Junior to keep me from losing my shit if an international rookie is hired to lead the Canadian Men's National team into 2026.  Much, much bigger. Golden generation and a once in a lifetime golden opportunity and someone, anyone, wants to roll the dice on a rookie?  On who from where? Budget constraints or no I think CSA HQ is aiming higher.  And rightly so.  
    • It would be "interesting" (for want of a far better word) if they stayed with Biello until December of 2025 when Herdman and his staff bail from TFC and he is brought back as the "pioneer" of the program to lead the way for the hosting of the 2026 World Cup.  
    • Langley look really good. The CPL vets look like CPL vets. At 2-0 they brought on more firepower and kept attacking, which I love, swashbuckling football. And I will reiterate my point about most of the young Canadians not likely getting a tonne of minutes this season. It will be interesting to see what they do with Cameron, White, Crawford, Campagna, Bah, etc. because I can see an indefinite unchanged starting back 4 at this rate. (Even though I have question marks about Norman and Gee against the top sides) And then there is finding time for Grady further up the pitch. Cantave and the young  Mexican Navarro will be subs 1 and 2 most nights if this continues. And both looked electric, so it's understandable. TJ will find minutes, surely. And Simmons and Verhoven are still to come into this matchday lineup. Not enough minutes to go around, barring a run of significant injuries. Their second best 11 could be as good as their first 11 at the start of last season. No exaggeration. Good problems to have but issues nevertheless.  
    • No one can know what the attendance actually was. But we know it can't possibly be 2702, because that is the number on the canpl website. 
    • It was part of what Neville said about bringing him to Portland, if I recall, and Neville had seen him with Canada. He is definitely the organizers of the pair they have there, from what I have seen.  I guess we can debate whether we trust Neville's judgement or not but that was the noise being made from my memory. 
    • Probably easier seen as a 4312 I guess.    Davies------------ Buchanan -----------David------------- Kone Eustaquio Choiniere/Ali Miller Cornelius Bombito Johnson    I would need to keep Davies in one of those wide attack positions, again they were quite mobile strikers.    The strikers might press across line the but it was it was rare the rest of the team did.  The default position of the 3 midfielders was withdrawn and they would wait until the fullbacks or their central midfielders were across half to engage.  Long range passing was pretty key at the back, including big diagonals.  Not my preffered formation but something that worked against more talented teams, coming up on 10 years ago now.  (One of the things that broke it was one of the strikers supposedly visiting a "natural" - wouldn't use the word "witch" - doctor for his back while on international duty.)
    • I like this thought exercise but trying to wrap my head around it.  It almost sounds like a 4-3-3 with a CDM and 2 CM and the striker playing as a false 9 given the CMNT profile. However, if west ham played 2 strikers than it sounds more 4 diamond 2.  How did west ham defend the opposing fullback. Do the strikers track the FB and Stewart downing then steps up to push the CB's to go a certain direction? How far back did the striker track the fullbacks, if at all?  Very interesting.   back 4 (with davies)  Staq Kone Choiniere ali David Tajon I think in this formation we probably drop larin. we could drop ali, move david back and have davies and tajon up front but thats 2 non strikers so I would assume having at least david there is important. This means we sit tajon or drop davies to lb.  Really tough for me to place cmnt players in this lineup   
    • To add to this, the L1 Cup game on April 20th was pushed hard at the Wolves OHL game last night. Posters all over the arena, ads on the scoreboard, and an announcement by the P.A. announcer.
    • I have huge respect for Bobby Smyrniotis as a coach, he is is great tactician and man manager in the CPL, I have had several in depth conversations with him and he is very personable and he relishes discussion with someone with a coaching background! However, I don't think it is his time yet to take this huge step, I would like to see him get experience elsewhere at a higher level, I could be wrong, maybe he would be just what we need but I am doubtful at this time!
×
×
  • Create New...