matty Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 34 minutes ago, Rheo said: Now for something constructive after my unconstructive Anchorman quote. It might be helpful if we all make sure we hit the CPL website everyday. They aren't updating it much since launch but I'm sure the traffic numbers will be important to advertisers/sponsors/media partners, etc. I've tried to go everyday to the main one and the fan section. They need to get forums or a news feed of all the articles on the CPL going that site is awful atm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 Just now, matty said: They need to get forums or a news feed of all the articles on the CPL going that site is awful atm I think it's part of their general rollout plan. They've admitted they exist and have the foundation set up but they'll let us know what they want us to know, when they want us to know. Frustrating for us nerds but in retrospect I've come to like how they've handled it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 3 minutes ago, Rheo said: I think it's part of their general rollout plan. They've admitted they exist and have the foundation set up but they'll let us know what they want us to know, when they want us to know. Frustrating for us nerds but in retrospect I've come to like how they've handled it. They're sending everyone here btw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 Just now, matty said: They're sending everyone here btw Yeah I literally just saw that on twitter a few minutes ago. Good too the synergy going on. Guess we should start behaving if company is coming over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopherbashi Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 1 hour ago, matty said: They're sending everyone here btw This will go down in history as a horrible mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 50 minutes ago, Gopherbashi said: This will go down in history as a horrible mistake. Cpl may 12, 2017 - may 30, 2017 (darkest timeline) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex D Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 10 minutes ago, matty said: Cpl may 12, 2017 - may 30, 2017 (darkest timeline) I wonder what's happening in the other timelines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopherbashi Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 1 minute ago, Alex D said: I wonder what's happening in the other timelines. CPL kicked off in 2014. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Hammer- Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 3 hours ago, Rheo said: I think it's part of their general rollout plan. They've admitted they exist and have the foundation set up but they'll let us know what they want us to know, when they want us to know. Frustrating for us nerds but in retrospect I've come to like how they've handled it. Yeah, it's pretty much a scaled down version of the Ti-Cats existing All Access site. That site is a loyalty program where you earn points as you browse, check in at games, buy merch through the store or click on sponsor deals. You then turn the points in for prizes or (more commonly) chances to win stuff, so it wouldn't shock me once the ball gets rolling they add that to the site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael Martin Posted May 30, 2017 Share Posted May 30, 2017 On 2017-5-23 at 8:24 AM, Rheo said: One point in the pod I liked was when talking the pros/cons of a 2018 launch was that it doesn't give fans the chance to drift off with the condensed schedule. A quick, intense run to engage, capture and keep the fanbase. Don't think I've heard that point brought up before Credit to that idea goes to @Alex D who shared it with me on our Michigan road trip a couple weeks back, a great thought! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael Martin Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 Just caught up to this crazy thread (hence my response to an old post). I was happy briefly because KWs awesomeness interrupted the circular broadcasting conversation...the return to the crazies was so quick and painful, it hurt ?. Welcome newcomers sent from the canPL Twitter account! Please forgive us, we've been starving a long time.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted May 31, 2017 Share Posted May 31, 2017 1 hour ago, Nathanael Martin said: Credit to that idea goes to @Alex D who shared it with me on our Michigan road trip a couple weeks back, a great thought! Sorry we couldn't meet up here on your way through. Hopefully soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 Vice on the cpl dos and don'ts https://sports.vice.com/en_ca/article/the-dos-and-donts-the-canadian-premier-league-should-follow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 Rollins article on Beirne's statement on here in regards to CanCon. http://www.canadiansoccernews.com/articles/canadian-premiere-league/beirne-canadian-quotas-unlikely-in-canpl-r34/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuillermoDelQuarto Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 On 5/30/2017 at 4:29 PM, matty said: Cpl may 12, 2017 - may 30, 2017 (darkest timeline) definitely misread this as "dankest" instead of "darkest" at first lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 12 minutes ago, GuillermoDelQuarto said: definitely misread this as "dankest" instead of "darkest" at first lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingback6 Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 On 5/30/2017 at 3:25 PM, matty said: They're sending everyone here btw Well.... no WAY that can backfire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 Rollins thoughts on CPL pro/rel http://www.canadiansoccernews.com/forums/topic/46494-prorel-4canada-derp-derp-derp111one11/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopherbashi Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 14 minutes ago, Rheo said: Rollins thoughts on CPL pro/rel http://www.canadiansoccernews.com/forums/topic/46494-prorel-4canada-derp-derp-derp111one11/ Here’s the thing though—history suggests that they’ll need to be shamed into thinking bigger. You start a typical North American league tomorrow and nothing changes at that level. Nothing. I almost guarantee it. But, if you start a league tomorrow that is structured in such a way that provides an opportunity – a challenge, really – to these clubs and, well…even the less ambitious are going to understand the need to, well, get off their ass. ^^ This is probably an important point - by all accounts, a lot of L1O teams have upped their game this year for a shot at the Voyageurs Cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion26 Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 Any mentions about having youth team set up from the start? That I think would be great to have going as soon as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oranje Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 On 6/6/2017 at 1:19 PM, Rheo said: Rollins thoughts on CPL pro/rel http://www.canadiansoccernews.com/forums/topic/46494-prorel-4canada-derp-derp-derp111one11/ What a nudnik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 19 hours ago, Scorpion26 said: Any mentions about having youth team set up from the start? That I think would be great to have going as soon as possible. Not likely to happen at the start due to cost of running one. Partnerships more likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Hammer- Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 On 6/6/2017 at 3:19 PM, Rheo said: Rollins thoughts on CPL pro/rel http://www.canadiansoccernews.com/forums/topic/46494-prorel-4canada-derp-derp-derp111one11/ I think he makes perfectly rational and valid points in almost every fashion. I think he's completely right with how crazed some of the Pro/RelUSA people can be, although in there case it is a bit more justified given that there is massive room for expansion in the US that a real 2nd league could alleviate. It's just that it won't be easy with how strong a grip MLS has now. As far as Pro/Rel in Canada, I think it's good to talk about it now, but make it clear, it doesn't get implemented until you have 20+ teams, so you can run a league of at least ten, with other smaller leagues. It really is a moot conversation until you have at least 10 teams to stand above the rest, and the rest ideally being of decent size too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Complete Homer Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 I honestly think this pro/rel talk is more driven by business plan than any sort of ideological platform I am pretty certain that, with some notable exceptions like Saskatchewan, markets #9-16 in size would generate much less revenue than those in #1-8. The only way to grow the league beyond CFL size, even within a single entity/high revenue sharing model, would be to have a second tier operating at a lower cost structure. But instead of having a "traditional" second tier league (in the North American sense at least), pro/rel allows teams in the second tier to at least partially shake the stigma of minor league sports and perhaps encourage more investment in secondary and tertiary markets than we have seen in the CFL. Within single entity or high revenue sharing, teams in the top tier could be assigned the lion's share of revenue while teams at a lower cost structure would get the minority, allowing teams in small markets that get promoted the ability to compete at parity while presumably not having drastic effects of the pyramid-wide revenue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazlo_80 Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 31 minutes ago, Complete Homer said: I honestly think this pro/rel talk is more driven by business plan than any sort of ideological platform I am pretty certain that, with some notable exceptions like Saskatchewan, markets #9-16 in size would generate much less revenue than those in #1-8. The only way to grow the league beyond CFL size, even within a single entity/high revenue sharing model, would be to have a second tier operating at a lower cost structure. But instead of having a "traditional" second tier league (in the North American sense at least), pro/rel allows teams in the second tier to at least partially shake the stigma of minor league sports and perhaps encourage more investment in secondary and tertiary markets than we have seen in the CFL. Within single entity or high revenue sharing, teams in the top tier could be assigned the lion's share of revenue while teams at a lower cost structure would get the minority, allowing teams in small markets that get promoted the ability to compete at parity while presumably not having drastic effects of the pyramid-wide revenue do you see this as a bad thing or a good thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.