Calgary Boomer Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I'm getting the impression from several folks that the veteren core of the Whitecaps will not be offerered contracts this season. That would affect Jeff Clarke, Steve Kindel, Alfredo Valente, Jason Jordan and possibly Geordie Lyall. You wonder if the club really is trying to groom the graduating prospects for 2011. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youllneverwalkalone Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 I'd say they might as well get ready for 2011. CONCACAF Champions League aside, what else can the club accomplish at this level? Teitur did a good job of bringing through some youth last year and those core players are approaching the age when most footballers need to think about retirement. My only additional comment would be that there are some player on that MOACA list who are young and playing at a fairly low level or are sitting on the pine. D'Agostino, Elliot and O'Neill all come to mind. It would be nice to replace some of those veterans with some local kids who are establish pros and can play right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 The quandary faced by the club and these players is the fact that the Whitecaps are moving to almost year round training next year including at least one overseas tour. These players all have other job commitments in addition to their previously parttime involvement with the Caps plus of course the older ones are approaching the end of their professional playing careers. Decision time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grizzly Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 It would be good for Canadian soccer if they are grooming young players for 2011 as long as these young players are Canadian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 How many of the players that the Whitecaps currently have in their youth system and on their roster will they be eligable to keep in MLS should they be accepted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masster Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 quote:Originally posted by RJB How many of the players that the Whitecaps currently have in their youth system and on their roster will they be eligable to keep in MLS should they be accepted? If I am not mistaken, Seattle had first dibs on all players that were on their USL roster. I would hope that this would be the same for Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deschamp86 Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 I imagine that a deal would be made with Vancouver in some capacity. Vancouver would set a good example in MLS as to how an academy should be run and I don't imagine Garber would undo what Vancouver has built. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmcmurph Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 quote:Originally posted by deschamp86 I imagine that a deal would be made with Vancouver in some capacity. Vancouver would set a good example in MLS as to how an academy should be run and I don't imagine Garber would undo what Vancouver has built. Once accepted the Caps also have the option of selling the players they've developed to Euro teams. If they are going to lose them anyway to the MLS for nothing or only get 1/3rd then develop them for 2 years and sell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandstander Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 quote:Originally posted by deschamp86 I imagine that a deal would be made with Vancouver in some capacity. Vancouver would set a good example in MLS as to how an academy should be run and I don't imagine Garber would undo what Vancouver has built. I would imagine the only sticking point is at what point the residency players become MLS property? I think until they sign a professional MLS contract, they can't be touched by the league. This would allow the Caps to bring residency players into the first team, or sell them to other clubs at their discretion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deschamp86 Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 quote:Originally posted by Grandstander I would imagine the only sticking point is at what point the residency players become MLS property? I think until they sign a professional MLS contract, they can't be touched by the league. This would allow the Caps to bring residency players into the first team, or sell them to other clubs at their discretion. Yes but at this point, MLS teams are only allowed to sign one or two academy players per year. Vancouver had more than that feature for them this year so I imagine MLS will change rules in that regard by the time Vancouver enters MLS. Hopefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgary Boomer Posted December 9, 2008 Author Share Posted December 9, 2008 Confirmed...Kindel Clarke and Valente not coming back. I think this is as much about their relationship with their coach as it is the desire to get younger players in the lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sstackho Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Veteran trio given cold shoulder; Philosophical differences' cited as reason for decision Marc Weber The Province 491 words 9 December 2008 Vancouver Province Final A38 English Copyright © 2008 Vancouver Province The face of the Vancouver Whitecaps franchise is undergoing a dramatic change. The club announced Monday it will not offer new contracts to longtime local favourites Jeff Clarke, Steve Kindel and Alfredo Valente. Clarke and Kindel, both defender-midfielders, were free agents, while Valente, a midfielder, was entering his club option year. Combined, the trio spent 30 seasons with the Whitecaps, helping the team to United Soccer Leagues First Division titles in 2006 and '08. They've been the team's leaders and poster boys and all three are embedded in the community. Clarke is the technical director and head coach at the Guildford Athletic Club; Kindel is the technical director for Dunbar and Kerrisdale and a head coach with Surrey United; while Valente is the head coach with Coquitlam Metro-Ford. Whitecaps president Bob Lenarduzzi and head coach Teitur Thordarson cited "philosophical differences" as the reason for the decision, and wouldn't expand much on that statement. Thordarson did say that it had been an issue "throughout the year." The Icelandic boss replaced Bob Lilley as coach last season and brought with him a more direct, offensive style. If it was a difference in soccer philosophy, it didn't prevent Thordarson from playing the trio -- all three started the final 10 games of the season, including five playoff games -- and it didn't prevent the Whitecaps from winning the USL-1 title. Clarke was also the captain for the fourth straight season, though Martin Nash carried those duties for the 12 games Clarke missed due to injury. "These players have been important to the success of the team and I am thankful for that," Thordarson said. "But there are differences here and we have decided to release them. Next year we will make a serious attempt at [winning a title] again." The players could not be reached for comment on Monday. Lenarduzzi reflected on the immense impact the three have had on the club over the years, but also said the move opened the door for residency players to step into senior team roles. "They were all there when the club almost went under [in 2002] and a lot of players played to keep the team afloat at the time we didn't have an owner," he said. "They deserve a lot of credit and, no question, you're not going to go locally and recruit players comparable to those three. "But at the same time, the move provides opportunities for younger players in our system." Coquitlam's Clarke and Burnaby native Kindel are 31. Valente, also Burnaby-raised, is 28. Clarke was the championship MVP in '06, Kindel leaves second on the club's all-time games and minutes-played list, and Valente is second all-time in assists. mweber@theprovince.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bettermirror Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 Very interesting to see where they end up eh? Valente must go out looking for further playing opportunities - possibly in USL or even, dare I say, TFC?? The other 2 - maybe they should expand their coaching networks? All three are involved in top youth programs as it is. With their connections maybe more local lads can become connected with the Whitecaps.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted December 9, 2008 Share Posted December 9, 2008 I would be surprised if Valente chose to try and continue playing professionally, especially outside Vancouver unless he receives an offer he cannot refuse which I suspect is unlikely at this stage. Like the other two he has a wife and young family and is head coach for Coquitlam Metro-Ford SC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgary Boomer Posted December 10, 2008 Author Share Posted December 10, 2008 All 3 of those guys have infants. Moving away from Vancouver isn't an option, unless we're talking about Portland. I don't know how much the head coach's get paid with their respective youth clubs, but I don't think it would be more than the Whitecaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regs Posted December 10, 2008 Share Posted December 10, 2008 A typical head coach position in BC runs from $40K - $60K from what I know of in few specific cases. I would be pretty surprised if anyone on the Caps was making that kind of dosh stricktly as a player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footy Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 Ok in today's Province newspaper a story finaly ! from the players point of view but as I read it no one mentioned what the main issue was with Tieter ! they just said that they met with him at the end of the season to bring up their concerns so what those concerns are your guess is as good as mine. So more muddled info and to add to it Sebrango takes a shot a Tieter backing up Valente, Kindel and Clarke ... Can I ask that someone in the know post some info on what Tieter did to piss these 3 off ? if nobody says what he did how can see this as just more than a football club looking to take their game to another level and only bring on full time players \? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youllneverwalkalone Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 I'm defintely not in the know in any way, but my educated guess would be that they got into some type of argument about conditioning. Most Scandinavian managers are pretty stringent when it comes to the fitness and it's possible that these three were unable to meet his demands given their semi-pro status. I imagine he would rather work with kids who are willing to train 24/7, espcially given that he's already won the Cup and now must focus on getting the club ready for MLS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandstander Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 quote: Yes but at this point, MLS teams are only allowed to sign one or two academy players per year. Vancouver had more than that feature for them this year so I imagine MLS will change rules in that regard by the time Vancouver enters MLS. Hopefully. I would imagine this will change with the disappearance of the MLS reserve league. They will rely on teams to develop their own players. So I can see the Caps still maintaining their PDL team or a USL 2 West team in the future to keep reserve/residency players match ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masster Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 I would love for the Caps to replace the released local guys with some unsigned local talent. The residency will go a long way in doing this, but that is still a couple of years away. With word that Mike D'Agostino has been let go by Blackpool, I think that is exactly the type of player that they should pursue. Marcus Haber is another local kid without a club. I wonder if they could convince Jacob Lensky to get back into pro football. Maybe these players don't want to settle for North America just yet. Maybe they might not all pan out (I have my doubts about Haber) but I'd love to see the Caps become more of a realistic option for local guys. It should be something up and coming players strive for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youllneverwalkalone Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 ^All of those guys are more or less at the age when Clarke and Kindel must have concluded that a career in Europe wasn't really in the cards. And unlike those guys, these kids have the prospect of MLS to look forward to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piltdownman Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 quote:Originally posted by Grandstander I would imagine this will change with the disappearance of the MLS reserve league. They will rely on teams to develop their own players. So I can see the Caps still maintaining their PDL team or a USL 2 West team in the future to keep reserve/residency players match ready. The MLS has said they are against teams developing their own youth players because its not fair because some teams don't want to spend the money or aren't in cities that support grassroots football as much as others. I think its an ass backwards way of thinking, but its that's their current thinking. Its becoming very clear that the MLS doesn't care about player development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscan Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 Perhaps they have turned away from player development as a way to ensure it becomes more than just a feeder league. If owners have to rely on purchasing talent rather than developing it and selling it off, players will be coming here rather than leaving here. Of course, this could get the league into an NASL situation, where only has-beens come here while younger, more talented players still end up going overseas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackTheBlizzard Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 Perhaps worth noting that MLS now has a mandated academy program involving all of the teams:- http://www.youthsoccerfun.com/2008/07/will_mls_youth_investment_pay.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscan Posted December 18, 2008 Share Posted December 18, 2008 Interesting that everything to do with MLS is so centralized. I wonder if MLS will ever be decentralized? Probably not for quite a while, at least not until soccer reaches a fairly high point of popularity in NA, so basically never? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.