Jump to content
  • Finding the audience


    Duane Rollins

    It almost seems blasphemes to openly worry about CanPL popularity at this point. Suggesting that the league will struggle to find relevance in a crowded sports market is something grumpy old sportswriters, clueless hockey fans and (some) Ottawa Fury fans do.

    The rest of us are all in. True believers in this wonderful project. Planning has been ongoing for five years now. Everything has been put in place to make this thing work.

    But…

    It’s failed before. Twice. First when the NASL blew up in 1984 (although that was more top do with American teams – OK, the New York Cosmos – overspending and ultimately misreading the market. Once the stars left so did the fans. The second time was all on us though. The CSL died on the vine in the 1990s and with it the hopes of nearly two decades of Canadian soccer.

    Those failures are not viewed with nuance by most. Rather, it’s just proof that trying again is foolish and that it’s only a matter of time until it all comes crashing down again.

    If you’re reading this you probably feel that things are different this time. You understand that two of the three NASL teams that didn’t fold (Whitecaps and Toronto Blizzard) were in Canada and both would have continued on if the league had not pulled the plug. It’s appreciated that the CSL was littered with owners who had far more good intentions than actual capital and that the CanPL owners are running in a completely different tax bracket.

    You get all that, but that doesn’t mean that the feeling will be held by the majority of sports fans in this country. Those grumpy sportswriters and broadcasters still hold a lot of influence. The most listened to sports radio show in the country has featured two segments on the latest attempt to start a spring football league in the USA, but not a single word on CanPL.

    We in the soccer community can dismiss the importance of this, but the reality is it’s an obstacle that is going to need to be overcome for the league to thrive.

    Note, I said thrive, not survive. It will survive just fine. The demographics have shifted. The soccer-hating generation is literally dying off. Twenty years ago it would have been inconceivable that the three MLS teams would have become as important to their market as they have. Now, it’s silly to even suggest that’s going to change. Flash-forward 20 more years and it stands to reason that many of the current CanPL markets, and some we have yet to even conceive, will feel the same way about their soccer team as Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal feel about theirs now.   

    But, there will be struggles initially. Struggles to get attention and to get butts in the seats.

    And, make no mistake, those that want the sport to fail – and their remains a few who do – will glory at any struggle the clubs face.

    Hell, even MLS still faces this in certain places. To the point that they had the research firm Boston Consulting research the market in 2015 so that they could grow their fan base. This is useful to CanPL fans in that they also included Canada in the research. Although they did not separate the data, you can draw conclusions of what CanPL will be facing when it comes to getting people to care.

    What they found was that 66% of MLS fans fell into one of two broad categories. The “Soccer enthusiasts”--  highly engaged, soccer-first fans – and the “Hardcore Sports Fan – basically the crazy guy at the end of the bar that can talk in detail about the 1996 Western Regional final in NCAA basketball while filling out his fantasy NFL line-up and watching the Sens play the Hurricanes on a Tuesday night in November

    That guy also likes soccer now. That’s a change over last couple decades.

    The thing is those two groups only account for 32% of all soccer fans. So, MLS is missing out on 68% of its potential market.

    Therein lies the biggest problem for CanPL. How do you avoid the same resistance to MLS that more than 2/3 of American soccer fans have?

    It starts by understanding why that 68% aren’t watching their local team. There the numbers are a little less obvious.

    The inclination of many would be to assume that those fans are so-called “Eurosnobs,” – fans only interested in watching the highest levels of play. However, the MLS research suggests that only 2% of fans fit that description. Related, that 2% account for 98% of the posts on BigSoccer’s US abroad forums.

    Where, then, do the rest fit in? We can only speculate, but it stands to reason that a good chuck are “MexiSnobs” and a good number don’t have a local team to relate to.

    You can’t do much about the ____Snobs fans. They have made up their mind for the most part. But, on the latter point you can absolutely address it. You need to be doing all in your power to make sure that the clubs are extensions of the community they represent.

    MLS does a lot of things right, but they often default to the business side of life. If you talk to a lot of MLS fans they will tell you that their loyalty is to the stand that sit in and the friends that have made at the game over the years more than it is to the franchise that they watch.

    Even as MLS teams do things to become true “clubs” they can’t ever totally shake that “franchise” label. The CanPL has the great advantage of being able to look at everything MLS has done right and everything that it has done wrong.

    And that might allow them to tap into the missing 68% more effectively.  

    Edited by Duane Rollins


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Please sign in to comment

    You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



    Sign In Now

  • Image from iOS.jpg

  • Posts

    • To be honest, mate, it is a big misunderstanding of the system based on the bolded fact.  If we are honestly comparing a very modern system to Canada '86, it should ring some huge alarm bells, don't you think? (Most) players are not complete idiots, they are not going forget principles over a few months.  
    • I like the idea of Smyrniotis and Wheeldon taking over our youth teams.
    • https://extra.ie/2024/02/27/sport/soccernews/paul-clement-who-is-ireland Bit of a short hand write up of his career. He was very much in the frame for the Ireland job. Has some international level experience with England u21s, Ireland u21s and coaches the full team for 3 games in the interim years ago.  It's a different ball game to club level. You deal with different pressures, conflicts and roadblocks, so I'd expect the panel deciding are looking for a few different attributes than we would perhaps harshly judge from an overview of a club level record in management.  Clement has lots of upside and is undoubtedly interested. We really need someone to inspire fans in addition to the players though. 
    • Generally I would try respectfully to say your understanding of this is many years out of date.  First 12 years ago and then almost 40.   First we have fit players in the forward areas. Second this is gegen-press, not all-out press as you have tried to say in previous posts.  It is based on greater player fitness - yes - but also video analysis, targeted pressing, staying compact and, honestly, is aided by have 5 subs.  To compare it to '86 is again, I'm sorry, honestly laughable.  There are what is called "rest phases" where you shape your self to get the ball at the feet of an opposition player that you have determined will less hurt you and wait to pounce on his next pass.  You also stay compact, so you aren't running far for 90 minutes.  If that does that mean you don't high press sometimes, so be it. There are three areas where Marsch specifically has talked about engaging the press, depend on the opposition and the moment. Only one of them is high.   You have said in previous post that our strength is with forwards and midfielders, that is who drives this.  We have, to name off the top of my head, players who would not neccesarily be in the first 11:  Millar, Nelson, Shaffelburg, Ahmed, Corbeanu, Russel-Rowe, Choiniere, Ugbo, even players like Brym or Fraser, who are playing to enough minutes at a decent level to maintain fitness. You have argued against your point yourself.  If you tell those players that not only will they get  minutes but also they are playing in a system designed to get them international goals, I think you have a lot that will work hard to know the system and be ready for their chance.   First, if we are going to move the goal posts and say we want a defensive system where we won't concede against world-class teams, then you win. This (or any) is not it. But it is designed to take pressure of the backline.   In the real world, we are not going to be running Vitoria in the back.  I can't see anyone not including Bombito and maybe Cornelius.  While they are going to be better at defending breaks than sustained pressure in my opinion, you, again are looking at this as all-out press, not gegenpress.    Overall, the principles are not that complicated and players aren't going to forget them when they go back to their clubs.  They mostly play at modern clubs where they will maintain fitness.     I take a little bit of an exception to the adore the system comment.  You don't need to read my other posts, but if you did you would know I like a lot of systems and like to see how they fit into Canada.  I like this one because it fits our players, as you have pointed out without acknowledging it, - young, fit, fast, in the mid-forward areas.    I like Marsch because he plays that system but also because he has experience in a number of places, including here,  I think he could garner the respect to get the players to play a system, which we need, and is actually realistically available. 
    • The TFC-Simcoe game used the current MLS Adidas ball, while the Nike swoosh is very visible on the ball in Cavalry-VFC. Now I'm wondering if Cavalry bought a bunch of Nike balls specifically to pull these shenanigans, because they would regularly use Derbystars for training and games. Or the less nefarious possibility is that they could have had a bunch of the Nike balls left over from the Concacaf Champions Cup, but I'm not sure how strict Concacaf is about taking back the equipment once games are done.
    • Good point. Showing my own age, I guess, Joe. Haha
    • His head coaching record is nothing to write home about, but aside from that Clement has been around some big clubs, worked with the best of the best and clearly has respect across Europe. Seems a lot of the feedback on his head coaching experience is that he plays a boring brand of ball, but interesting name to consider.
    • In this thread post match updates on all Canadians for April 26th to May 2nd If you find updates posted in some other thread then post them here as well, but be sure to credit the original poster. If there is news that is particularly significant (eg. someone scores a big goal, someone gets injured, etc.) then feel free to begin a new thread on that topic in order to draw greater attention or start a discussion, but also post that news here. Some comments on news posted in this thread are okay, but let's not let this thread go off into a long discussion. If the news already appears in another thread (as per the previous bullet) then post your comments in that other thread, otherwise if you want to say something significant or if it is likely to generate replies then begin a new thread
×
×
  • Create New...