CanadaFan123 Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 Sure it was a penalty but 4 seconds earlier there was a clear and obvious high boot that should have ended the game. The ref maybe was a little too curious and absurdly let play continue. Shortdutchcanuck and -Hammer- 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Hammer- Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 (edited) Yeah, there was a lot of diving by Cavalry as I saw it that the ref rewarded. Escalante should receive a game for how blatant his were. As far as the high boot, that should have been called, and the game ended there. As far as the card on the goalie, it should have been a yellow, but was a penalty kick, all day. Too many mistakes from the ref in my eyes, who should be made to sit out the rest of the V-Cup for his performance. Maybe I have my team colored glasses on, but that's how I saw it. Edited June 5, 2019 by -Hammer- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzie_the_parrot Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 Agree the borderline dangerous play thing on Becker at the top of the box looked like a possible way to end the game if it had already run over, but once he gave the penalty it had to be a red because Roberts was last man and took away what was not much more than a tap into an open goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyslexic nam Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 On the replays it was hard to see if the high boot was an issue or if he pulled out at the right time. I took it as fairly telling that Bekker didn't pull back - usually if there is a boot actually in your face when trying to head the ball, there is an obvious reaction even if there is no contact. To me, that suggests that while the foot was high, the player pulled out of the kick early enough that the ref didn't feel the need to stop the play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzie_the_parrot Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 More fall out from the game: https://northerntribune.ca/cavalry-fc-racism/ Just when you thought the return leg couldn't get any more heated. grande 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaFan123 Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Why don't we hear what was said? I have a real problem with people making serious accusations and providing zero details. I don't think players would make that up but I also can't imagine a coach, within earshot of the half dozen black players on his own team, saying something racist - this is a strange one. If something racist was indeed said then someone needs to provide details so we can get to the bottom of this and sort it out. gator, Winnipeg Fury and Lofty 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzie_the_parrot Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 The league has released a statement to say they are investigating: https://canpl.ca/article/canadian-premier-league-statement-cavalry-fc-forge-fc-incident Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gator Posted June 6, 2019 Author Share Posted June 6, 2019 14 hours ago, CanadaFan123 said: Why don't we hear what was said? I have a real problem with people making serious accusations and providing zero details. I don't think players would make that up but I also can't imagine a coach, within earshot of the half dozen black players on his own team, saying something racist - this is a strange one. If something racist was indeed said then someone needs to provide details so we can get to the bottom of this and sort it out. That's the part that just doesn't make sense to me, I don't think his own players would tolerate that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SthMelbRed Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 On 6/6/2019 at 4:35 AM, Ozzie_the_parrot said: Agree the borderline dangerous play thing on Becker at the top of the box looked like a possible way to end the game if it had already run over, but once he gave the penalty it had to be a red because Roberts was last man and took away what was not much more than a tap into an open goal. The correct decision on the penalty call would have been a yellow card. For it to be correctly called a red card offence, the referee would have had to determine both that the GK was not attempting to play the ball on the play and that none of the three remaining defenders within a yard of the ball could have possibly made a successful intervention. Based on two viewings of the highlights package, I have to question this particular referee's competence for the job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now