Jump to content
  • The numbers say...plan the parade!


    Duane Rollins

    Back in the glory days of the 24thMinute.com (no one blogs anymore. It’s kind of sad, he says ironically) I used to publish a monthly projection of the MLS standings that was designed to take into consideration the massive swing in fortune between teams playing at home and on the road.

    Many TFC fans got irrationally angry at such a suggestion because, at the time, they had seen no evidence of teams excelling at home. Man, weren’t those early days fun! However, the simply projections proved to be remarkably accurate throughout the years that I published them.

    After a Twitter exchange with Kurt Larson and Doug Roberson of AJC.com earlier this week I was compelled to revisit my old tracking system. The impetus to the discussion and my curiosity was the fact that Atlanta has an absurd six game home stand in September.  As with TFC’s absurd road trips to start 2015 and 2016 the reason for the long stretch at home is stadium related. The Falcons are building the latest shrine to the NFL (No, Tom Brady has not been invited to the grand opening) and Atlanta United is sharing in the spoils. By all accounts it’s going to be one hell of a stadium. It must be because it’s not exactly one of those Soccer Specific Stadiums Don Garber talks about when it fits his agenda.

    At any rate, Larson felt that this long home stand, combined with a current solid run of form, meant that Atlanta was in the Supporters Shield race. Roberson, who covers the team for AJC.com, agreed, with the caveat that Atlanta was a difficult team to project in 2017.

    I, the contrarian I tend to be, disagreed and I threw a whole bunch of those fancy stats at them to back up my opinion. Specifically they have the worst PDO in MLS, were 12th in xGoals, 19th in xGoals against and 12th in TSR.

    For those who read the above paragraph as Greek – the PDO number means they are, statistically speaking, the luckiest team in the league, score way more goals than their possession and shot placement would suggest, let in fewer goals than the same against them would suggest and they typically give up more shots than they get themselves (which has proven to be a very effective measure of success in global football, albeit less so in MLS).

    Now, part of the reason Atlanta’s numbers are lower might be because they’ve played more road games than home games (12 to 8), but it’s still dangerous to ignore them completely.

    There’s little to no guarantee that a home heavy schedule will automatically mean that you can just automatically say 6 x 3 = 18 GO! Just ask 2015 TFC about that…

    But, anyway. I decided to break it down into the simplest projection I could think of to try and factor in the home schedule of Atlanta’s to see how much of a penitential threat the upstarts are to TFC’s Shield run.

    Before I present the table please remember that I fully understand that a projection based on past performance in no way guarantees that the same form will continue. It simply means that IF teams continue to play the way that they have this season thus far we can reasonably project that they will finish with X amount of points.

    This isn’t a complicated formula (H pts / H GP x 17) + (R pts / R GP x17) = Projected final points.

    Here are the results:  

    East

    1.       Toronto FC 66

    2.       Chicago 62

    3.       NYCFC 59

    4.       Atlanta 59

    5.       NYRB 54

    6.       Columbus 49

    7.       Orlando 45

    8.       Montreal 44

    9.       Philly 39

    10.   New England 39

    11.   DCU 30

    West

    1.       Dallas 61

    2.       SKC 54

    3.       Houston 53

    4.       Seattle 50

    5.       Vancouver 48

    6.       Portland 46

    7.       San Jose 43

    8.       RSL 38

    9.       Galaxy 37

    10.   Colorado 31

    11.   Minnesota 27

    Plan.

    The.

    Parade.

    Ok, maybe not, but the projection backs up the eyeball test that TFC remains the clear favourite to capture the Shield and it also suggests, as most eyeball tests have also suggested, that Dallas is the class of the West.

    Another thing that it suggests is that if you’re under the red line in July, it’s going to be a fight to pull above it by October. It’s happened, but far, far less likely than the hype-masters at league headquarters would have you believe. The standings at the 2/3 point are usually pretty close to how things will shake out at the end.

    In terms of Atlanta, it does show a very healthy return on points, but ultimately they are probably too far back already in MLS, where 6 points might as well be 20. Of course it all resets to 0 once the final 12 are decided.

    As for TFC…maybe don’t plan the parade, but start sketching out the Shield winning tifo design. Quietly. You wouldn’t want to jinx it, after all.     


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Please sign in to comment

    You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



    Sign In Now

  • Image from iOS.jpg

  • Posts

    • I really love AGR. Almost universal great takes and clearly a hell of a mind for the game, stats etc. I Like the content he and the one soccer team do. What I got from that long video and homage to Marsch (said tongue in cheek):  - question marks on whether his style would work at the international level - question marks as to how his style could be detrimental to players - question marks on on his club career and how successful he is in general.  - question marks on his commitment if the US comes calling  And ultimately that Marsch is, almost clearly from the rumoured list, our best choice despite all of that. While its a bit of a fun. I also don't get the excitement with his beef with Gregg/US program. That is US drama, we are potentially the rebound partner laughing until we realise he is still in love with her not us. We don't need more drama. Especially USA drama.  Also the big, he knows concacaf. Does he? He knows the MLS. Did he have lots of experience with the other 90% of concacaf. Does the MLS thing matter all that much when half the squad is coming from Europe? Sure it's nice but does anyone believe a coach that didn't manage in MLS would be able to work it out?  Honest to God I apologise for another pointless rant and honest I don't hate the guy and think he would absolutely be a bust. I think there is a lot of overt excitement in that video and elsewhere about this list of guys that arguably are worse on paper than Floro. There is limited to no international management experience. Not the be all end all if they have stand out resumes and success at other levels. While likeable I don't think there were many people ever convinced by solskjaer. He fits the same would as lampard, Gerrard, Henry, shearer.. they got given opportunities of their name as a player/club idol. Yes they managed big name players, they worked with them is a better word as didn't each ultimately not manage to handle the egos? We are also where we are at but it's not the same Canadian team prior to Herdman, there is huge potential and opportunites to grow. There just seems to be two ends to this spectrum and an invisible more realistic missing list of the middle. As @youllneverwalkalone rightly says, absurd. Can't we have a coach somewhere closer to the middle of this list and mourinho? 🥵 I'm all over Bobby as assistant whomever takes charge.    
    • He deserves a good long look, but so does Bombito.  The only question for me would be whether you have the position awareness, organization and leadership there with them as a pair. 
    • Tuchel's coming to West Ham, don'cha know?   *sound of an off-camera gunshot*   
    • Marsch was an international assistant to Bradley for a not unsubstantial number of games.    I have never seen Christiansen even implied as wanting to come to us, so not sure how he is any more realistic than coaches not actually under contract currently.   You do usually have to pay fees  to get people out of those.   I am not sure why he tops people's lists. Panama in the last cycle has beat the teams they should and lost to the teams they should (the USA B/C squad at the Gold Cup  being a positive exception and Jamaica in the Nations League a possible negative one.)  That says good not amazing to me.  Combine that with him having such a mediocre club record compared some of the others.  But most important, personally, would say his teams are too much build slowly, possession-based to really take advantage of what our best players do.   
    • Maybe Ghotbi is trying to deflect from his squad's poor performance but whining about the balls is a pretty lame excuse IMO. Cavalry played far from their best on Tuesday and Vancouver couldn't capitalize. They went down to 10 (rightfully so) and then took it to Vancouver. 
    • If you want him to play leftback and stick to being a left back, then it goes against what you said about being versatile.  He needs a defined role and we need a defined system.  The debate about where is different, but I probably agree he is not a player you hand the keys to the offence and say "go be versatile." But you do say go harass and beat people on the wings and then cut it back to the plethora of finishers we have or make room for yourself because you are not a bad finisher yourself.  That's your role.  And David and Larin are similar, they are not versatile players who create their own chances,  they both can be good in transition but most often they are beholden to service.  We don't have an amazing 10 to unlock defences and give them that service, instead you look for a system that provides it.  Fonseca's at Lille is an example, but if you listen to him speak about his coaching (he has been linked with West Ham) it is a defined system that requires pressing.    I would appreciate the Herdman quote about the World Cup and "pressing".  My impression was he let the players play more attacking because they wanted to, I don't remember much about pressing. I could be wrong.      Again, respectfully ,your last couple of sentences, to me, misunderstand what gegenpress is.  If you have a defence you are confident in, like a number of English managers, you clog your final third and invited the pressure and, win the ball back there, then look to counter.   In Ragnick/Klopp/Marsch ideal, you really never want the ball getting to your defence.   You are trying to get the ball back much higher, where are our good athletic players are - Davies, David, Buchanan, Kone - if he had a coach that could  instill that in him - and Eustaquio who can at least run all day and can pick a pass.  The defence will look to jump in offensively  and protect breaks - we will have a much more athletic group than the World Cup , I am willing to bet - but you shouldn't need, as much, players whose strength is dealing with sustained pressure, which are  what I would say would be the faults of the inexperienced group we might send out.  So if we have good athletic forwards and maybe a suspect tactical defence, the Marsch system is a great fit to use the strength we have and try to lessen the prominence of the weakness.   
    • Let's bloody well hope so!
    • It has all that. What is usually missing is Concacaf youth qualifiers. Women match info is improving but often don't have player background info & match analytics and at times don't have the lineups.
×
×
  • Create New...