Jump to content
  • Long live the Nations League!

    Duane Rollins

    The controversy in Ottawa this week is distracting Canadian soccer fans from what will mark John Herdman’s competitive debut as manager of the men’s national team. That’s maybe for the best, as the first game is hardly a page turner. The US Virgin Islands haven’t played a game since 2016 and have been outscored 14-0 in the last two games they played.

    USVI has won five games in its history, three of which have come against the British Virgin Islands in what I do hope is called the Virgin Derby.

    They do not have a single professional on the roster. The highest level any of the players are at would be either Marshall University or the NPSL’s Dallas City.

    This is arguably the weakest team Canada has ever faced in its history. It’s no hyperbole to suggest that you could field a stronger side by taking to top players from Toronto’s TSSL. Hell, you might not even need to take the top ones.

    The weakness of the match-up is likely why John Herdman is lukewarm about the CONCACAF Nations League. It’s hard to see what Canada gains from playing this game. And, this is not time for the peanut gallery to chime in about how you can’t take anything for granted and any team can upset another, etc. That’s not actually true. The gap is that large. The only question will be how big the victory is.

    However, it would be wrong to dismiss the Nations League’s importance based on this game. Even if Canada somehow completely bottles this classification period they still won’t be anywhere close to playing these types of teams again. This is the one and only match up they’ll get with the absolute bottom of CONCACAF. The worse shape Canada will realistically be in next year is in Group B, which will be against the Saint Kitts and Nevis and Guadeloupes of the world.

    Best case is a home and home with the US or Mexico next year. That’s a realistic outcome as the top 12  nations will be in league A. Even after 8-1, Canada was still in the top 12.

    Most people understand how important it will be to blood the young Canadian players in Central America and the Nations League provides the opportunity to do just that. San Pedro Sula? Bring it. Please.  

    Beyond Canada, the Nations League will also help countries like the US Virgin Islands by simply giving them games. Once they settle into the bottom group they’ll play competitive games against competition that is suited for them. The hope is that they’ll improve to the point where if there is a next time that Canada has to play them there might actually be a slight chance of the upset.

    That’s probably a while away, but it’s nice to see CONCACAF addressing this issue, which has been around for a long time. The truth is they aren’t asking the bigger nations to sacrifice much. The US and Mexico will still have plenty of windows available to book glamor friendlies (and will probably get a competitive game against each other in the Nations League every year). Basically, everyone wins.

    So, sit back and enjoy a rare stress free game involving Canada on Sunday. Bet the over.  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    So far I love the Nations League format in UEFA and CONCACAF. Seeing bottom feeder teams actually have chances at victories and in the case of UEFA, automatic qualification to the Euros. The more games these smaller countries get, the better it will be for the rest of the countries.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^^^Used to play WOSL games in Delhi. Always had to watch out for the obviously too good for a district level amateur league Jamaican guys that got brought in as ringers on temporary work visas to work on the tobacco farms. Hard to believe a small town in rural SW Ontario could be such a den of iniquity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Image from iOS.jpg

  • Posts

    • I think he's gone. Testing the waters for a Koleosho makes sense. He's young, in demand, and has multiple good choices. Halbouni is not that. Given Halbouni's age, level of play, and stature on his club team, this seems like a recognition that Syria is the best way to progress his career and most likely way he's going to play in a World Cup. His path into the Canadian team isn't clear and involves a lot of waiting that could burn a few years of viable international soccer while Syria is willing to call him while playing at a level that Canada will not. And turning his back on Syria is a bad look.
    • It’s also just dumb.  It’s Piette.  Is it really harder to type his name than the alternative? 
    • I also note the wording - “childhood dream of playing football at an international level”.  It is a pretty conspicuous absence to not mention the country of that is a specific part of the dream.  Most guys would say how they dreamed of representing Syria - if that in fact was the dream.  The way he said it makes me think he was really just being pragmatic about his international options at this harsh elf his career.    All that aside, I definitely hope for a full and speedy recovery.   
    • To me the term is just reducing the person down to an invisible characteristic.  In this case, he could have called him by name, number, hair length, but instead went with the invisible identifier: The other day the muslim and Eustaquio The other day the jew and Eustaquio The other day the schizophrenic and Eustaquio The word itself isn't loaded like some other offensive words, but using it how he did brings negative energy. And on this message board given that we're all (expectedly) supporting Canada, this was not like it being thrown around amongst friends.  Whereas it might not be offensive in casual conversation amongst friends, the intention here was to single out Piette as different, and did not seem benign to me when I read it.  If he knew enough that Piette was from Quebec, then he knew what number he was.  It is embarassing that @JAVIERF would stoop to this level.  Also, Samuel Piette is not French, so the Frenchie moniker is derisive.  Perhaps he identifies as Quebecois, or French-Canadian, but he is playing for Canada! Anyhow, that's my feeling.  I didn't like it one bit.  Lots of worse things to say for sure, but we're better than this.   At least that's what I think from BC.
    • Result and details of the Sat Sep 24/22 MLSNEXT Pro playoff game between Toronto FC II and Philadelphia Union II played at BMO Field. http://www.rocketrobinsoccerintoronto.com/reports22/22tfc267.htm  
    • Interesting but don’t really agree with many of the %’s. Only Qatar, Ghana and Australia have worst % chance to get out of the group then us. Moreover, Costa Rica has a significantly higher % then us in there group and I would say the 3 sides in that group are equal or better than the 3 other sides in our group. Plus giving Qatar 0% is harsh as while I think they are mediocre, they are playing at home and the 3 sides in their group are the weakest by far compared to the others 
    • Result and details of the Sat Sep 24/22 MLSNEXT Pro playoff game between Toronto FC II and Philadelphia Union II played at BMO Field. http://www.rocketrobinsoccerintoronto.com/reports22/22tfc267.htm
    • Just curious, but is this considered derogatory or offensive, or is it merely annoying to you? I haven't heard anyone say "Frenchie" in a long time, and I assumed it was just outdated label, or perhaps just used older generations of people, but now I am wondering if maybe it's considered politically incorrect, or something. Is that the case? Cheers
    • On Belgium, I think we should play as Wales did in the second half with a 4-5-1. I think that would gum up there attack and expose their creaky defence more.  Honestly, Croatia scares me more as I am not sure what we do to stop them. For Belgium, I would play David Davies Eustaquio Osorio Piette/Kone Buchanan  Adekugbe Miller Vitoria Johnsto That would be solid defensively, with Eustaquio and Piette able to play the ball over the top or to Osorio who can play it out wide. And that would allow the combo of Davies David and Buchanan to shread them on the counter.    you could bring on Larin, Laryea, Kone or Piette, Hoilet or Millar as subs if needed 
  • Create New...