Jump to content
  • Long live the Nations League!

    Duane Rollins

    The controversy in Ottawa this week is distracting Canadian soccer fans from what will mark John Herdman’s competitive debut as manager of the men’s national team. That’s maybe for the best, as the first game is hardly a page turner. The US Virgin Islands haven’t played a game since 2016 and have been outscored 14-0 in the last two games they played.

    USVI has won five games in its history, three of which have come against the British Virgin Islands in what I do hope is called the Virgin Derby.

    They do not have a single professional on the roster. The highest level any of the players are at would be either Marshall University or the NPSL’s Dallas City.

    This is arguably the weakest team Canada has ever faced in its history. It’s no hyperbole to suggest that you could field a stronger side by taking to top players from Toronto’s TSSL. Hell, you might not even need to take the top ones.

    The weakness of the match-up is likely why John Herdman is lukewarm about the CONCACAF Nations League. It’s hard to see what Canada gains from playing this game. And, this is not time for the peanut gallery to chime in about how you can’t take anything for granted and any team can upset another, etc. That’s not actually true. The gap is that large. The only question will be how big the victory is.

    However, it would be wrong to dismiss the Nations League’s importance based on this game. Even if Canada somehow completely bottles this classification period they still won’t be anywhere close to playing these types of teams again. This is the one and only match up they’ll get with the absolute bottom of CONCACAF. The worse shape Canada will realistically be in next year is in Group B, which will be against the Saint Kitts and Nevis and Guadeloupes of the world.

    Best case is a home and home with the US or Mexico next year. That’s a realistic outcome as the top 12  nations will be in league A. Even after 8-1, Canada was still in the top 12.

    Most people understand how important it will be to blood the young Canadian players in Central America and the Nations League provides the opportunity to do just that. San Pedro Sula? Bring it. Please.  

    Beyond Canada, the Nations League will also help countries like the US Virgin Islands by simply giving them games. Once they settle into the bottom group they’ll play competitive games against competition that is suited for them. The hope is that they’ll improve to the point where if there is a next time that Canada has to play them there might actually be a slight chance of the upset.

    That’s probably a while away, but it’s nice to see CONCACAF addressing this issue, which has been around for a long time. The truth is they aren’t asking the bigger nations to sacrifice much. The US and Mexico will still have plenty of windows available to book glamor friendlies (and will probably get a competitive game against each other in the Nations League every year). Basically, everyone wins.

    So, sit back and enjoy a rare stress free game involving Canada on Sunday. Bet the over.  

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    So far I love the Nations League format in UEFA and CONCACAF. Seeing bottom feeder teams actually have chances at victories and in the case of UEFA, automatic qualification to the Euros. The more games these smaller countries get, the better it will be for the rest of the countries.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^^^Used to play WOSL games in Delhi. Always had to watch out for the obviously too good for a district level amateur league Jamaican guys that got brought in as ringers on temporary work visas to work on the tobacco farms. Hard to believe a small town in rural SW Ontario could be such a den of iniquity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please sign in to comment

    You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

    Sign In Now

  • Image from iOS.jpg

  • Posts

    • You're attempting to re-word my stance. I'm 100% on board for change. I want ali over oso, crepeau over borjan.   However, my main point is how can you say vitoria contributed 0 when he played 90 minutes. Obviously he contributed something. - a header, organization, a pass, a block. He contributed. He showed he can be on the field against a top end opponent and we can win for the first time in 30 years.  To take away every single ounce of credit towards him is just incorrect. It shows bias. If ZMG put in the exact same performance as vitoria did (which is plausible due to lack of pace), you wouldnt say he contributed 0.  At no point did I say I want to stick with vitoria. -youre manipulating my argument again which is nonsense. I will restate my point. It is astronomically incorrect to say vitoria contibuted nothing against jamaica. Give credit where credit is due, give criticism where criticism is due. (sure you can be reasonably harsh or positive but youre assesment is not just harsh, its blinded by bias). Again, if you said vitorias very beneficial for his heading and organization, but hes so slow that its time to replace him, then I would stand with you..... but be reasonable towards a guy whos given everything to our team. 
    • One side has religious, dogmatic fervour on this, mate, and it's you when your ridiculous "facts" about the Championship get challenged.  Try arguing the point you made, not calling people who disagree with you "apes" and engaging in that pulpit-style rhetoric that is really silly on a football forum.
    • Basketball is definitely still a contact sport.  Not in the way hockey or football is, but there is a lot of contact in the paint.  My tall skinny kid tried to play centre against a lot of generally big bulky dudes and they def get to use the body to gain and hold position etc.    and it isn’t gentle.   I think that permitted degree of contact, in a port that doesn’t allow outright hitting, is what leads to the subjectivity. And for the record I definitely still see players getting in the face of refs to pressure them into calls.  Maybe not the Barca mob anymore but it is still very much present.      
    • It's funny you mention contact because I see basketball as a non-contact sport (it's not my fathers basketball anymore). I feel like you're overstating the surrounding of the referees. Gone are the days when a team like Barca would surround the referees on every decision and intimidate and influence the refs to make a decision...I think we only see it now when a VAR decision is to be made, and at that point it's pretty much out of the head refs hands as they are being influenced by VAR officials.  If I'm not mistaken majority of the top professional leagues has rules against the surrounding of referees. 
    • CANMNTBibile dropping a rumour and this board eating it up 
    • Oh no. Not another one of these
    • Vaughn Covil - Championship player at Hull City focused on US and England... but seemingly eligible for Canada due to a Canadian born mother.
    • Well said. This announcement is encouraging on three fronts.  First, that it removes the possibility of a second league-owned team (understandably) folding.  Second, that a new ownership group stepped up to join the league, given how there's been a gap in drawing in new groups.  Maybe this will encourage potential expansion teams.  Third, that they apparently still believe in the Toronto market so they aren't taking up another potential expansion location. On the downside, as you point out, it doesn't magically solve any of the issues that have caused York problems in the first place.
  • Create New...