jogesc2 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 No Colin is an ASA Board member and cannot vote at an SGM. That's good to hear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kj52 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Duberger gone, voting on Kern, Innes next. Keep it up folks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Motion to remove Mr du Berger carries 208 for 99 no, 2 abstentions Cusa, lakeland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-collins Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Kern - Medicine Hat, Lethbridge, CUSA abstained. (@leanne_mccarthy) Do we have a tally in this thread of the associations and their votes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Kern is out? Tweets say voting for Innes is up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kj52 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 One task that will need doing is striking Traficante and Kern's names off the trophies for men and women going to senior nationals (Mike Traficante Challenge Cup and Fred Kern Jubilee Trophy). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kid Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Bye Bye Fairthought! Elvis has just left the building BYE BYE COLIN INNES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Kern gone. Motion carried Colin being voted on. CUSA and Ft.McM abstain. Motion carried Robert Hayne up. Motion made and seconded. #ASASGM Hayne "can see the writing on the wall. Thank you." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kid Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Robert Hayne is voted off as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Abstained: med. Hat, lethbridge, and CUSA. Votes being tallied. Motion carried. Hayne gone Chater too scared to come. Motion made to remove her. Seconded. She had to work. I bet everyone else here had to work, too. Motion carried to remove Chater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuckles Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 at the meeting theyre all falling fast and furious i was disappointed at the public showing but it looks like the districts got their crud together that being said lets get some people in that are going to progress soccer in alberta best part of the whole thing was when a long term member spoke details to folllow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17thumper Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 For anyone who is well versed in the legal running of a not for profit organization, could not all the removed board members be held financially responsible for the mess the association is in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvroArrow Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Have the CSA delegates said/done anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Chris Jossy removal motion made and seconded. Jossy speaking: "thanks and best of luck." Carried. Jossy done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 That's it for the board members right? Bylaw amendment has been seconded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachRich Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 17thumper, NP usually have a Ideminty clause in their By-laws but it doesn't cover them if they have acted in a willful way of neglect or wrong doing. In the ASA by-laws it Article 22 - Indemnity. A good audit and review of the NP documents will usually find out what has gone on and if someone can be held responsible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustFixIt Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Have the CSA delegates said/done anything? Reply from @ReformABSoccer: silence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redcoatsforever Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 That's it for the board members right? Bylaw amendment has been seconded. Anybody got a link to the content of the bylaw amendment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17thumper Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 17thumper, NP usually have a Ideminty clause in their By-laws but it doesn't cover them if they have acted in a willful way of neglect or wrong doing. In the ASA by-laws it Article 22 - Indemnity. A good audit and review of the NP documents will usually find out what has gone on and if someone can be held responsible. Thank you for clearing that up, your insight was helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17thumper Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 http://www.reformalbertasoccer.com/Timeline-2010/change-log/newsgmrequestandreponsefromasaexecutivedirector Hope this works, got it from the RAS site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustFixIt Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Anybody got a link to the content of the bylaw amendment? http://www.reformalbertasoccer.com/library/2010.12.07-DOCASASGMDEC10.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1 A Director of the Association is not permitted to be a Director or Officer of any Active member or Associate member of the ASA. Within 30 days of a person being elected or appointed to the ASA Board, the person must resign from any director or officer position of any Active or Associate member failing which the Director will be terminated from the ASA Board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Motion to amend bylaws carries with EMSA abstaining and all others for. 287/0/49 Wow. Awesome. Congratulations Alberta and thanks from the rest of the country! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmcmurph Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Motion to amend bylaws carries with EMSA abstaining and all others for. 287/0/49 Wow. Awesome. Congratulations Alberta and thanks from the rest of the country! EMSA abstaining? Wow the depression must be setting in bigtime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shield69 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Impressive! As we move forward from the darkness of these middle ages of Alberta soccer let's not repeat the mistakes of the past. When the new board is elected at the AGM they will be tasked with the challenge of progressing beyond today's status. I hope all out there who are given the honor of guiding the game forward do so honorably. There can be no retribution towards the districts and associations that naively or unwillingly participated in the Charpentier debacle. The players, coaches and volunteers of those associations should not be held accountable for the actions of the dictators that seized control. It does, however, behoove everyone to ensure that this does not happen again. Let's keep the momentum up and pressure the EMSA and CMSA membership, from the grass roots, to remove their boards and start anew. Moms, dads, players... get involved and ask your representatives what they plan to do now. I see a similar series of motions at an EMSA SGM, perhaps next week at their planning meeting (ouch... that is going to be one tense place to be). Someone with inside goods, please find the financial statements of EMSA that would pry open the ugliness of MC, IM and co. as surely EMSA monies must have been spent on this debacle. To the EMSA membership, ask the questions... did MC's dual duties ever overlap and at what expense to EMSA? Was EMSA money diverted away from its programs and operating costs to facilitate this atrocity? Will MC now step down, for the good of EMSA, so that EMSA might move forward within the new ASA with a clean sheet and a fresh start? I believe a famous spider's uncle once said, "With great power comes great responsibility". If the reform movement fails to truly reform (i.e. backlash and retribution creep into the mix) then reform will die here in Alberta. The rest of Canada needs this to succeed... for the love of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-collins Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.