Jump to content
  • Beirne: Canadian quotas unlikely in CanPL


    Duane Rollins

    It appears that there will not be a Canadian quota in the CanPL.

    Paul Beirne indicated as much in a post on the Voyageurs discussion board. However, he followed it up by stressing that the league would still be vastly comprised of Canadian players. That would be accomplished by putting a restriction on the amount of foreign players permitted, rather than by putting a specific number on Canadian roster spots.

    The information written by Beirne, corresponds with what CSN has been told by various people over the past two years or so.

    From the beginning, CSN has been told that there was a resistance to requiring X amount of Canadians per team.

    That opinion is informed by the CFL owners, who has experience with the "non-import" rule in the CFL. They feel that the rule artificially inflates the salary of Canadians and puts a financial strain on their ability to build the best rosters possible. TFC argued the same thing back in 2008, after having to vastly overpay for Canadians in year one.

    Although restricting "imports" creates the same end result as requiring x amount of Canadians, it isn’t thought to have the same impact on salaries.

    However, as Beirne wrote, it's also always been stressed that there is no way this league isn't going to be made up of a majority of Canadian players. The economics of the league will dictate it.

    A better question to ask is whether there will be anything put in place to ensure the percentage of Canadian playing minutes is protected -- i.e a starters quota like we saw in the old NASL or in the Voyageurs Cup now.

    Unfortunately, the idea of a starters’ quota has also been resisted from what CSN has been told. The reason is the same as why a Canadian roster spot requirement is resisted – fear of salary inflation. If, say, three Canadians are required to start every game then that puts a premium on Canadian roster spots as it’s likely that the club with the best Canadians is going to be at a competitive advantage.    

    Edited by Duane Rollins


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Please sign in to comment

    You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



    Sign In Now

  • Image from iOS.jpg

  • Posts

    • Simmons still not even on the bench for Vancouver. Weird since coach mentioned they were back to full health. Guess he didnt travel to Calgary in the first place. Love that TJ is there. Cameron at RB will have to be much better than he was midweek. And we shall see what this team looks like without  without Renan anchoring the midfield line. Fry is somewhat dodgy defensively to my eyes and Kibato is still an unknown for me, hopefully not his teammates as well. I think this will be a pretty even contest.
    • Started this thread last year. Forgot to start it this year.   Here are the current amounts as of the end of WEEK TWO. Club Total U-21 Minutes York United FC 318 Pacific FC 315 Valour FC 182 Forge FC 44 Vancouver FC 37 Halifax Wanderers FC 34 Cavalry FC 31 Atlético Ottawa 8
    • surprise as sturing is back and he goes straight in the 11 as it seems nash got it about higgins and drops him to the bench...cordova straight in the 11 also kibato cameron tahid in for garcia chung fisk so lets see if they can still be dominant even with three changes
    • His girlfriend is more than alright.  (Though someone needs to tell her Theo hasn't played for the Whitecaps in 2 years.)
    • I agree with much of what you wrote, but at the same time I think you've also touched on some of the "deficiencies" of gegenpressing - and whether those would cause real problems for the CMNT (or not) is of course the question.  I.e. It does depend on fitness.  No, it's not all-out 90 minute pressure but when their left-back bobbles the ball at 70' your RW and number 10 have to be just as ready and willing to jump on him as they were at 10'.  Gegenpressing loses its effectiveness as the gegenpressers become less willing/able to do it.  (As Rangnick found out quickly with CR7 😉) The principles are relatively easy to learn, but in practice, the coordination/positioning of the gegenpressing is both critical and not so easy.  If your LCM loses the ball, and the LW thinks he's supposed to stay high and wait for a counter rather than jumping in to double-team the possessor, it could be a problem.  That kind of real-time misunderstanding can literally occur dozens of times in a game and lead to big issues.  It's why the standard "lose possession, drop back" strategy is the tried and true approach for many teams - especially ones (like national teams) that haven't spent much time together.  I would also add that often the teams who are good at gegenpressing have an on-field quarterback (e.g. Thomas Muller in Hansi Flick's Bayern) who direct the gegenpress (e.g. the static periods, the traps, the "when to exceed the 6 seconds" vs when to drop back, etc.)  I'm not sure we have that kind of quarterback in our roster.   But I do agree that on paper, if any national team has the personnel to do this kind of tactic, it's probably us.  And if you do it right, it can be huge gamechanger - especially for athletic teams who are built for attack rather than methodical build-up. 
    • I think the experience that we have to worry about is what Herdman had learned with the women, man management in tournament play over a short period.  Some criticize his tactics but isn't that really done by committee with the HC being the final arbiter.  And wasn't the Spanish guy in charge of X and Os (dunno, just asking)
    • Santi Gimenez is being linked to Milan
×
×
  • Create New...