Daniel Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 Thread: http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?t=415933 Original article: http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/soccer/20060927-9999-lz1s27goal.html "In one early-season FC Dallas match against Colorado, 1,259 tickets were sold and 7,347 were comps." From BS: -On average 22% of regular-season match tickets last season was complimentary -The average paid attendance for the 2005 season was 10,746 per match, or 29 percent less than the 15,108 “official attendance” reported by the league. -Average paid attendance with international doubleheaders taken out was less than 10,000 for 2005 season. -Galaxy leads in paid attendance by a lot: 19,940. Second is RSL with 12,689. FC Dallas is last with 6,634. Half of the teams are below 10,000. -League-wide paid attendance for midweek matches is 6,477. -Often, announced attendance is higher than even the total tickets distributed number. Columbus had a conspicuous difference of exactly 1000 people between announced attendance and distributed tickets for 9 games in a row last season. Columbus spokesman said the difference is due to vouchers and credentialed personnel. -2006 media guide claims that 2.9 million fans attended MLS regular season games in 2005. The Game Attendance Summary reports only 2.65 million total tickets were distributed, and of those just over 2 million were paid tickets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 Your point being? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoyleG Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 MLS padding attendance to gain new sponsors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 This doesn't concern me. With many pro-clubs in Europe playing with similarly low attendance numbers, particularly in the SPL, and EPL, I don't see this as a big concern for MLS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 Sponsors and others are concerned with the number of seats occupied, not whether or not the tickets for them were bought or complimentary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted September 28, 2006 Author Share Posted September 28, 2006 Seeing a team like Dallas only selling 1,259 tickets for a game or a team having 1.5x more comp tickets than sold means that these teams are not healthy enterprises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgary Boomer Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 And the USL doesn't do the exact same thing? Have you been to a Lynx game? Same with Charleston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoyleG Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 quote:Originally posted by Calgary Boomer And the USL doesn't do the exact same thing? Have you been to a Lynx game? Same with Charleston. But MLS is a professional league with professional conduct. They shouldn't have to be resorting to such things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted September 28, 2006 Author Share Posted September 28, 2006 Yeah, I'll hold MLS to a different standard than the Lynx... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amacpher Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 quote:Originally posted by RJB This doesn't concern me. With many pro-clubs in Europe playing with similarly low attendance numbers, particularly in the SPL, and EPL, I don't see this as a big concern for MLS. EPL? Really? Nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest speedmonk42 Posted September 28, 2006 Share Posted September 28, 2006 Well I don't think is much doubt in many peopls minds that the lower end markets for MLS would do much better in Van and Montreal. MLS in Montreal with CCR would do much better than many, and they are getting a new Stad. A more interesting attendance investigation might compare facilities. Not sure exactly what it would reveal, but look at the attendance of quality facilites against some pretty crappy ones... aka Dallas(I am pretty sure it was Dallas I saw on TV and it looked like a dogs breakfast) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted September 28, 2006 Author Share Posted September 28, 2006 Dallas has had a new SSS in the boondocks since last August. It's pretty sweet if appalingly empty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 quote:Originally posted by amacpher EPL? Really? Nonsense. Nonsense is right. Lower division English clubs is what I meant to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackTheBlizzard Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 quote:Originally posted by Daniel Dallas has had a new SSS in the boondocks since last August. It's pretty sweet if appalingly empty. The figures quoted in the San Diego paper primarily includes games at the Cotton Bowl then. The new SSS has looked reasonably full to me the few times this season I have been paying attention although that isn't immediately obvious because the camera angle used tends to be away from where most of the crowd sits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted September 29, 2006 Author Share Posted September 29, 2006 quote:Originally posted by BringBackTheBlizzard The figures quoted in the San Diego paper primarily includes games at the Cotton Bowl then. The new SSS has looked reasonably full to me the few times this season I have been paying attention although that isn't immediately obvious because the camera angle used tends to be away from where most of the crowd sits. Dude, we have *not* been watching the same highlights. That place always looks empty. And yes most of the 2005 season was at the Cotton Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackTheBlizzard Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 quote:Originally posted by Daniel Dude, we have *not* been watching the same highlights. That place always looks empty. And yes most of the 2005 season was at the Cotton Bowl. There was a Bigsoccer thread on this at one point with pictures to prove the point I made. I'll try to locate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free kick Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Aside from the Dallas numbers, I don't really see the big crisis. I never quite understood the facination with planting soccer in Dallas or Texas for that matter. When I think of Dallas or Texas, I don't think of soccer but rather football, oil companies, steak houses, and gas guzzling vehicles. Its not as if every club overseas plays their matches in front of packed houses in 80K seat stadia. Besides, even if there are many comps, it doesn't mean that they dont contribute to the bottom line. The guy who pays for the board ad is only concerned with how many people will see that ad and not how many people paid to see that board. On the other hand, I think that the numbers in New York/ New jersey are low. Especially when you consider the packed houses that the Cosmos were able to achieve in the days of the NASL. It's got to improve in NYC if the game is really going to establish a foothold in the US. For the league to thrive, New York and by extention the North east, is key from a sponsorship and marketing standpoint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanKeay Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 Daniel has penis envy..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Posted September 29, 2006 Author Share Posted September 29, 2006 But my wiener is so small! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOareaFan Posted September 29, 2006 Share Posted September 29, 2006 quote:Originally posted by RJB Nonsense is right. Lower division English clubs is what I meant to say. So far this year, the lowest average attendance in the EPL is Wigan with 15,497. On average, this year, Wigan has filled 61.99% of their seats. The median averages for all EPL teams this year is an average attendance of 27,433 and 86.11% of their seats filled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.