masster Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 Great turnout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1996 Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 What time is the press conference today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rheo Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, 1996 said: What time is the press conference today? You know you can look at the countdown right 3 hours and 31 minutes from now so 3pm EST. First one I can watch at work and not at the bar lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuzzAndSting Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 1 hour ago, Rheo said: You know you can look at the countdown right 3 hours and 31 minutes from now so 3pm EST. First one I can watch at work and not at the bar lol When does the counter reset? At the start of the event or sometime after? I’m more curious at this point if they’re skipping a week or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 5 minutes ago, BuzzAndSting said: When does the counter reset? At the start of the event or sometime after? I’m more curious at this point if they’re skipping a week or not. To be seriously accurate.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unnamed Trialist Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 1 hour ago, admin said: To be seriously accurate.... Yes, but: Event "A" is an observable changing function of time, "t" or A(t) = a(t) where the functional form of a(t) could be 15sin(7t) if the observable event A were the oscillatory positions of a pendulum, swinging with amplitude 15 in some system of units. (I use this example, despite its having repetive occurances of "A" because the inverse function has a well know name and that helps in my specific illustration/example.) Likewise some other changing observable event, say B(t), which if you still need specifics you could consider to be the position of Mars in its journey around the sun, but lets be general. We have two equations: A(t)=a(t) and B(t)= b(t). Inverting (Solving each separately for "t") we get: t=a'(A) and t=b'(B). As I fear some are already confused, i.e. not with me any longer, I will briefly return to the specific example: This inversion of the equations with the prior specific example: A(t) = 15 sin(7t) leads to 7t = arcsin(A/15) or t= {arcsin(A/15)}/7 which for convenience and generality, I have called a'(A). (The function form of a' ,which was an "arcsin" in this specific example, is only expressible in the general case symbolically and I have chosen a'(A) to represent it.) Becoming more general still by considering some other observable, C, I get: t = c'(C) etc. for every observable in the universe. Now eliminating time from all equations of the universe (and this is the proof that it is not needed to describe all observables in the universe) we have: a'(A) = b'(B) = c'(C) = ..... That is every observable in the universe can in principle be related directly to any other observable without any reference to time.Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/time-does-not-exist-math-proof.65439/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad_Impact Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 Meh...disappointed with this one. I really liked the logo's shared on the forum for Halifax so this is a let down imo. A logo doesn't have to have the teams name in big/bold lettering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.