Jump to content
lazlo_80

CPL new teams speculation

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

The same way Fury got an ultimatum, the Canadian MLS teams should be advised their Americans will be treated like Canadian players in the States if there is not reciprocity by a certain year. Say for the 2022 season. 

USL had no problem doing this for Canadians when we had even a smaller proportion of USL clubs in that league. There is no legal basis for not doing it in MLS, no statement by US soccer they'd oppose it, and no serious argument that it would cut into too many spots for Americans and damage MLS as a core league for th USMNT. 

I've said this exact same thing, even with the green card rule. Americans will cite US labour laws, but I've been calling bull$hit for how quickly these rules can change when things change. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

The same way Fury got an ultimatum, the Canadian MLS teams should be advised their Americans will be treated like Canadian players in the States if there is not reciprocity by a certain year. Say for the 2022 season. 

I think they can only do that on Canadian soil.

I'm not convinced they care about Canadians being domestics except for themselves as that gives them an advantage over the others US clubs for Canadian talents (granted they've mishandled the management of it quite spectacularly)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

The same way Fury got an ultimatum, the Canadian MLS teams should be advised their Americans will be treated like Canadian players in the States if there is not reciprocity by a certain year. Say for the 2022 season. 

USL had no problem doing this for Canadians when we had even a smaller proportion of USL clubs in that league. There is no legal basis for not doing it in MLS, no statement by US soccer they'd oppose it, and no serious argument that it would cut into too many spots for Americans and damage MLS as a core league for th USMNT. 

There may be no statement by US soccer, but it's absolutely the USSF behind the ruling.

MLS doesn't care about domestic quotas. If anything, no quotas would be great for the league (but terrible for U.S. and Canadian players).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, dyslexic nam said:

Ultimately, this is the only sort of authority that FIFA has.  They can't actually prevent new soccer leagues from forming in whatever fashion they want, or prevent any player that wants to from signing with them. 

What they CAN do though is not allow any player affiliated with these rogue/non-compliant leagues to play in FIFA competitions.  You only mention club competitions but FIFA has the added hammer of operating the biggest and most popular single sport event in the world.  And for most players - including all of the elite players that would be on teams interested in a "super league" - that is a very significant lever. 

Bringing this back to MLS, if FIFA chooses to challenge things (and again, not advocating for this - just discussing the dynamics of it) this is important because a lot of USMNT ply their trade in MLS.

You know what's also a significant lever? $$$$$$$$$$$$$

You can say players wouldn't go just for the money, because they'd still want to compete in the World Cup.  But you know what?  I've been watching Canadian NBA players decide they'd rather not play for team Canada and just stay with their NBA teams over the summer rather than try to get Canada to the Olympics (the other massive sports organization and the pinnacle of international basketball).

Ultimately, I can see the billionaire owners of the super rich/elite clubs just saying F*** it, through massive amount of money at players to play in their super league, and FIFA and UEFA 100% capitulating to them because they still want the best players in the world in their tournaments (because they don't make their own insane amounts of money without them, and they sure as hell aren't sharing it with the players).  I mean, we're not there yet.  But one day...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Watchmen said:

You know what's also a significant lever? $$$$$$$$$$$$$

You can say players wouldn't go just for the money, because they'd still want to compete in the World Cup.  But you know what?  I've been watching Canadian NBA players decide they'd rather not play for team Canada and just stay with their NBA teams over the summer rather than try to get Canada to the Olympics (the other massive sports organization and the pinnacle of international basketball).

Ultimately, I can see the billionaire owners of the super rich/elite clubs just saying F*** it, through massive amount of money at players to play in their super league, and FIFA and UEFA 100% capitulating to them because they still want the best players in the world in their tournaments (because they don't make their own insane amounts of money without them, and they sure as hell aren't sharing it with the players).  I mean, we're not there yet.  But one day...

 Comparing Olympic basketball to the World Cup seems pretty... wrong.  NBA players already play in the worlds best competition.   Going to the Olympics, where team America wins every single year, is a fun bonus for some, but not remotely like the WC.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, dyslexic nam said:

 Comparing Olympic basketball to the World Cup seems pretty... wrong.  NBA players already play in the worlds best competition.   Going to the Olympics, where team America wins every single year, is a fun bonus for some, but not remotely like the WC.  

Since the US started losing FIBA World Cups they take it more seriously, most years. It didn't help to lose a WC at home. And the Olympics go with that. This summer I bet most of the major stars will go because they were terribly embarrassed at the last WC. 

I think the overall vision of players could be changing, as they understand there is more to the legacy, and since many may never win an NBA ring, the Olympics is at least a medal.

What happens with Canadian basketball is shameful, even players from other nations who do compete for their countries are amazed we care so little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

Since the US started losing FIBA World Cups they take it more seriously, most years. It didn't help to lose a WC at home. And the Olympics go with that. This summer I bet most of the major stars will go because they were terribly embarrassed at the last WC. 

I think the overall vision of players could be changing, as they understand there is more to the legacy, and since many may never win an NBA ring, the Olympics is at least a medal.

What happens with Canadian basketball is shameful, even players from other nations who do compete for their countries are amazed we care so little.

Fair enough.  But comparing the willingness of Canadian players to skip the Olympics and the interest of soccer players to play in the WC still seems wrong (which was my main point). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dyslexic nam said:

Fair enough.  But comparing the willingness of Canadian players to skip the Olympics and the interest of soccer players to play in the WC still seems wrong (which was my main point). 

You are 100% right, no player would even want to miss a WC in soccer. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

You are 100% right, no player would even want to miss a WC in soccer. 

For the record, we are thinking about heading to Victoria in June to watch Canada’s bball Olympic qualifiers against China and Greece.  Seems like there is less fence sitting this cycle by some of our NBA guys.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dyslexic nam said:

For the record, we are thinking about heading to Victoria in June to watch Canada’s bball Olympic qualifiers against China and Greece.  Seems like there is less fence sitting this cycle by some of our NBA guys.  

I think Nurse has been working on it a bit, last summer he had too little time to set things up. 

Then you have the situation at Raptors with Gasol winning both NBA and Worlds and the coach being Scariolo, the assistant at Raptors. So there is buzz there. Gasol has come out and wondered why the Canadian players don't support their national program, sort of berating them for the lack of committment. 

Imagine, though, Spain won the World's without Ibaka, Mirotic, Pau injured. The team only had 4 NBA players, and only three were starters. Teammates of Canadians in Europe like Kevin Pangos getting less club minutes than he does were starting for Spain. What matters is committment to the project and passion to really do something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

You are 100% right, no player would even want to miss a WC in soccer. 

Players retire from international soccer. Some players play for countries that never have a hope of making it. Others would 100% drop playing at the WC for enough money. But ultimately, I 100% believe FIFA would change its rules and allow any players from a super league to play in a WC. They're too corrupt and care more about anything that might hurt them financially (ie the possibility of the best players in the world not participating) than about what's actually best for the sport.

And please note, I'm not saying this super league is good or bad. That's not my argument here. Just that I don't think Fifa's "rules" matter as much as others do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, dyslexic nam said:

 Comparing Olympic basketball to the World Cup seems pretty... wrong.  NBA players already play in the worlds best competition.   Going to the Olympics, where team America wins every single year, is a fun bonus for some, but not remotely like the WC.  

NHL players play in the world's best competition too, and it hasn't stopped them from wanting to play in the Olympics (and being absolutely furious at Bettman not going/using it as a CBA bargaining chip).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Watchmen said:

NHL players play in the world's best competition too, and it hasn't stopped them from wanting to play in the Olympics (and being absolutely furious at Bettman not going/using it as a CBA bargaining chip).

Yes, I agree.  Most athletes want to compete at the Olympics as they recognize it is a prestigious competition they want to be part of - just like the World Cup for soccer.  Your NHL example supports the idea of athletes' desire to play in these sorts of competitions - which is counter to your initial point.  The fact that basketball players in some subset of countries don't seem to feel this way about the Olympics (again, where the US is the presumptive winner so other countries are basically playing for silver) in no way supports the idea that soccer players will happily pass up the chance to play at a WC - which was your original point.

" Players retire from international soccer. "

- Yes, but not usually while they are still playing at the highest levels of soccer (ie. for those kinds of super elite clubs that would be part of a super league).

" Some players play for countries that never have a hope of making it. "

- Yes, but generally not those that play for the elite super clubs. Look at the rosters of Barca, RM, Chelsea, Juve. etc.  Most of those guys are fixtures at the WC.

" Others would 100% drop playing at the WC for enough money."

- This may be true, but it is predicated on the idea that the clubs would get absolutely ridiculous amounts of extra money to throw at players in a way that would massively increase their current wages.  And given the huge revenues they already enjoy (including preferential shares of TV money, Champion's League money, etc) I am not sure participation in a super league would let them pay so much that players would walk away from the most prestigious cup competition in the world. Don't forget, participation in a super league means they wouldn't get existing CL revenue streams and could very well be excluded from national leagues (giving that money away as well).

"FIFA would change its rules and allow any players from a super league to play in a WC... {since) they're too corrupt and care more about anything that might hurt them financially"

- I also think you are way oversimplifying things.  Yes, FIFA would allow players to play if they stood to lose a ton of money because they excluded the best players in the word.  But a lot of questionable assumptions are built into that "if-then" scenario.  Players might not back the clubs seeking to do this  if things came to a standoff, knowing that FIFA would at least try to exclude them from the WC. 

There is a reason this hasn't happened in the 20+ years clubs have been threatening it. More specifically, I suspect there are many good reasons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In a move that's at least partially related to what we've been talking about: The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has very definitely ruled that the US (and Australia) are unique in the sport. Specifically, that FIFA never intended the promotion/relegation principle to apply in these countries and that closed leagues can be allowed. If CAS is confirming that a closed circuit league is allowed in North America, I'm sure the 3 Canadian MLS clubs would have a strong case to say they can stay in it.

https://www.espn.com/soccer/major-league-soccer/story/4049041/mls-gets-favourable-promotion-relegation-ruling-from-cas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Watchmen said:

In a move that's at least partially related to what we've been talking about: The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has very definitely ruled that the US (and Australia) are unique in the sport. Specifically, that FIFA never intended the promotion/relegation principle to apply in these countries and that closed leagues can be allowed. If CAS is confirming that a closed circuit league is allowed in North America, I'm sure the 3 Canadian MLS clubs would have a strong case to say they can stay in it.

https://www.espn.com/soccer/major-league-soccer/story/4049041/mls-gets-favourable-promotion-relegation-ruling-from-cas

Orange and apples.

The organization/structure of the league was being challenged, not Article 73.

Also, the ruling reinforced that FIFA can pretty much do whatever they like in the way they interpret their own rules and that CAS won't be in their way.

Whenever FIFA decides to enforce it in North America in regards to the 3, (when the waiver is expired and they will need to reapply), nothing can be done about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Ansem said:

Orange and apples.

The organization/structure of the league was being challenged, not Article 73.

Also, the ruling reinforced that FIFA can pretty much do whatever they like in the way they interpret their own rules and that CAS won't be in their way.

Whenever FIFA decides to enforce it in North America in regards to the 3, (when the waiver is expired and they will need to reapply), nothing can be done about it.

I think it's more the importance of the region being recognized as "unique", which this ruling does.  With multiple other examples of major leagues in NA being intertwined (NHL, NBA, MLB), there's probably a solid basis for CAS to rule in MLS's favour.  Assuming FIFA/CONCACAF decided not to renew any waivers.  Just like how MLS never wants their "option" year contracts actually challenged by CAS (see: Camillo and Larin), FIFA/CONCACAF may not be eager to see Article 73 actually challenged either.  Much, much easier to just extend the waiver on this situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Watchmen said:

I think it's more the importance of the region being recognized as "unique", which this ruling does.  With multiple other examples of major leagues in NA being intertwined (NHL, NBA, MLB), there's probably a solid basis for CAS to rule in MLS's favour.  Assuming FIFA/CONCACAF decided not to renew any waivers.  Just like how MLS never wants their "option" year contracts actually challenged by CAS (see: Camillo and Larin), FIFA/CONCACAF may not be eager to see Article 73 actually challenged either.  Much, much easier to just extend the waiver on this situation.

I really dont get how you make the leap that this ruling somehow guarantees that FIFA will back extending the waivers. CONCACAF certainly hasn't indicate that it's leaning that way at all.

-The clubs' case cited a sub-section of FIFA statutes stating "a club's entitlement to take part in a domestic league championship shall depend principally on sporting merit." The FIFA article also notes participation "may be subject to other criteria."

That's the little bit that got Silva's claim thrown out as FIFA decided to use this to justify not enforcing this rule. His claim was flawed anyhow as he was trying to force his way into MLS which started as a closed league, not a pro/rel league that broke away to closed itself. That's the huge difference here.

If you look at what happened in lower US division, nothing prevents USL to get their standards upgraded and apply for a D1 status just like they did when applying for a D2 status when the NASL was still around. Meeting all the USSF criteria for D1 and still being denied could have gave him an antitrust case against MLS/SUM/USSF. But hey, I get it, it costs way more and is way more complicated than hoping FIFA does the bidding for you, which didn't happen.

This has nothing to do with Article 73 which FIFA has been enforcing consistently AND in Canada/US aka Ottawa Fury. We can't even qualify to CCL via the league contrarily to Monaco and the Welsh clubs...what does that tell you? How "integrated" are we really with MLS/USSF if the whole deal is possible thanks to waivers? Canadians aren't even domestics across the board but you're arguing we should get the "North American league exception" when our roster rules are not the same like the NA other leagues.

This is where that "argument" doesn't hold for me. We're "glorified guests" in that league, nowhere near fully integrated like the Welsh Clubs, Monaco or Canadian teams in North American leagues.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/7/2020 at 9:39 AM, Watchmen said:

...I don't think Fifa's "rules" matter as much as others do.

excuse me wtf GIF by Married At First Sight Australia

Give your head a shake. FIFA is the most powerful sporting organization on the planet. The IOC bows before them. Nations bribe them to host events and suspend laws to favour them.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ansem said:

Lyon was interested but changed their mind and won't invest in CPL.

Well first, they do say they idea is partially postponed. It could always be revived. Maybe they need a stronger local ownership deal and a more consolidated structure, which they got by buying Seattle Reign.

The bit about Tony Parker is a bit odd, he is majority owner of ASVEL Lyon-Villeurbanne which is in Euroleague, I think there may be some alliance with OL, but not sure what. Don't see how that is relevant to the CPL or soccer in North America.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

Well first, they do say they idea is partially postponed. It could always be revived. Maybe they need a stronger local ownership deal and a more consolidated structure, which they got by buying Seattle Reign.

The bit about Tony Parker is a bit odd, he is majority owner of ASVEL Lyon-Villeurbanne which is in Euroleague, I think there may be some alliance with OL, but not sure what. Don't see how that is relevant to the CPL or soccer in North America.

 

Yes the reporting is being challenged as the subject seems clearly to be about Basketball and not soccer 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Ansem said:

Yes the reporting is being challenged as the subject seems clearly to be about Basketball and not soccer 

Well thanks, that really clears it up in that regard. They are talking about an NBA franchise, which is kind of wild--I don't think Olympique has that kind of money.

There were rumours about Montreal looking at an NBA team, which came out during the playoffs last year: https://nba.nbcsports.com/2019/05/31/adam-silver-once-again-throws-cold-water-on-idea-of-nba-expansion-anytime-soon/

Probably Seattle would be the first team to pick up a franchise that is not working now.

This basketball focus  suggests that perhaps the whole CPL speculation is intact, OL and Roma are perhaps looking at possibilities. That is what we heard, this article does not negate the rumour. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Unnamed Trialist said:

Well thanks, that really clears it up in that regard. They are talking about an NBA franchise, which is kind of wild--I don't think Olympique has that kind of money.

There were rumours about Montreal looking at an NBA team, which came out during the playoffs last year: https://nba.nbcsports.com/2019/05/31/adam-silver-once-again-throws-cold-water-on-idea-of-nba-expansion-anytime-soon/

Probably Seattle would be the first team to pick up a franchise that is not working now.

This basketball focus  suggests that perhaps the whole CPL speculation is intact, OL and Roma are perhaps looking at possibilities. That is what we heard, this article does not negate the rumour. 

Admittedly I didn’t read anything but they were considering a team in the NBA?! I assumed it was CEBL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...