Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why does the CSA exclude past Nutrilite championship results in seeding teams for the Nutrilite Canadian Championship? Are last year's MLS and NASL championship results more important/relevant than last year's Nutrilite Canadian Championship results? Does any other national soccer association seed its competitions by using only the results of outside competitions?

The CSA's rule for seeding is:

"Teams will be seeded according to their final position their respective leagues ~ Major League

Soccer teams first followed by NASL (or equivalent). Where more than four teams are eligible for

entry into the Nutrilite Canadian Championship a play-in competition will be organised by the CSA

in the fall prior to the Nutrilite Canadian Championships. Major League Soccer clubs will receive

a bye direct to the Nutrilite Canadian Championship."

Please answer the question first before giving us your opinion on Robert starting another thread on this issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does the CSA exclude past Nutrilite championship results in seeding teams for the Nutrilite Canadian Championship? Are last year's MLS and NASL championship results more important/relevant than last year's Nutrilite Canadian Championship results? Does any other national soccer association seed its competitions by using only the results of outside competitions?

The CSA's rule for seeding is:

"Teams will be seeded according to their final position their respective leagues ~ Major League

Soccer teams first followed by NASL (or equivalent). Where more than four teams are eligible for

entry into the Nutrilite Canadian Championship a play-in competition will be organised by the CSA

in the fall prior to the Nutrilite Canadian Championships. Major League Soccer clubs will receive

a bye direct to the Nutrilite Canadian Championship."

Please answer the question first before giving us your opinion on Robert starting another thread on this issue.

Just as a heads up, if you use the Nutrilite results from last year, the seeding doesn't change.

But you're correct, they should be seeding using the Nutrilite results instead of the League results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as a heads up, if you use the Nutrilite results from last year, the seeding doesn't change.

But you're correct, they should be seeding using the Nutrilite results instead of the League results.

Most domestic cup competitions use previous league standings as seeding, IIRC.

Our closest neighbour does this with the US Open Cup, and in one of the 347993148654 other threads that Robert has started on this subject, it was shown that Italy does this for the Coppa Italia.

However, you are correct that the Nutrilite results would have seeded the teams exactly as they were, so really Robert is grasping at straws here (again).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree that the NCC should be used, and hopefully will be used next year so TFC can play edmonton again and rest up for the Vancouver v Montreal winner. Wait a second..thats the conspiracy..dastardly Toronto would have to play the lower seed again next year.

i was so happy to see a "robert thread" but then was very disappointed by the low comedy value in this one. please try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most domestic cup competitions use previous league standings as seeding, IIRC.

Our closest neighbour does this with the US Open Cup, and in one of the 347993148654 other threads that Robert has started on this subject, it was shown that Italy does this for the Coppa Italia.

However, you are correct that the Nutrilite results would have seeded the teams exactly as they were, so really Robert is grasping at straws here (again).

They do. But I'm of the opinion we should be using previous cup standings, because there's no promotion/relegation between NASL/MLS, so NASL sides will always be the lower seeds, regardless of if they're reigning champions or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, its nice to see that a few agree that the Nutrilite matches should be used in the seeding process. If MLS and NASL matches are also used, maybe they could be weighted in a similar fashion that is employed in Europe to determined the winner of the Golden Boot award. For example, MLS points could be multiplied by 2, while NASL points could be multiplied 1.5. I don't care who is seeded first, second or third, as long as it is a fair system and that everybody knows what the system is. Personally, I don't see why, in a four-team competition there can't just be a draw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I don't see why, in a four-team competition there can't just be a draw?

Because this isn't just a knockout Cup tournament held for its own sake. It's a tournament specifically designed to qualify its winner for our regional club championship. The CSA has an interest in trying to make sure the best prepared club represents Canada in that tournament. Establishing the principle that clubs from lower leagues will necessarily have a more difficult path to the final now, before the tournament starts expanding, is a sensible measure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the same apply to the Men's World Cup. The eight seeded countries are placed in one bowl (none of the countries are assigned numbers 1 through 8). Three more bowls contain eight coutries which are seperated so they are not drawn against each other in the group stages. FIFA does this to avoid the number 1 ranked country in the world meeting the number 2 ranked country in the group stage. However, Spain for example is not grouped with the weakest country from each of the remaining three bowls. The way the CSA conducted their "DRAW" this year clearly favoured the TFC in every regard.

Because this isn't just a knockout Cup tournament held for its own sake. It's a tournament specifically designed to qualify its winner for our regional club championship. The CSA has an interest in trying to make sure the best prepared club represents Canada in that tournament. Establishing the principle that clubs from lower leagues will necessarily have a more difficult path to the final now, before the tournament starts expanding, is a sensible measure.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there should be a rule that should not have the first round matches repeat the next season .

Why? Why should clubs not be seeded according to performance? That's stupid.

The phrase "Familiarity breeds contempt" comes to mind.

The more you play, the bigger the rivalry/hatred becomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. Most major sports leagues in North America and Europe try to find way that make it more difficult for clubs to become dynasties. They feel its bad for business if teams like the Montreal Canadians, the New York Yankees and the Real Madrids of the world dominate major competitions for five consecutive years. The CSA on the other hand goes out of its way to help the TFC win the Nutrilite Canadian Championship year after year? What does Mont Pete know that Sepp Blatter and Gary Bettman are obviously missing?

there should be a rule that should not have the first round matches repeat the next season .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the Yanks' problem for not recognizing a great competition.

Should the English FA Cup only include the top two divisions, because Manchester United occasionally play their stiffs?

Having amateur clubs compete with professionals is fantastic. Whine all you want, but the US Open Cup makes the NCC look like a parochial weekend festival by comparison.

The NCC desperately needs to include more divisions. It's getting stale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the Yanks' problem for not recognizing a great competition.

Should the English FA Cup only include the top two divisions, because Manchester United occasionally play their stiffs?

Having amateur clubs compete with professionals is fantastic. Whine all you want, but the US Open Cup makes the NCC look like a parochial weekend festival by comparison.

The NCC desperately needs to include more divisions. It's getting stale.

Your club should try winning it, then. Mix it up a bit. ;)

In all seriousness, I want the NCC to eventually become an open competition, too. The key word is "eventually", as building a national cup from the top down requires stability that only the fully pro clubs can priovide right now. It'll happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's why the US Open Cup is far, far superior to the Canadian Championship.

I like the US Open Cup too and wish the Americans would recognize the great little tournament it could be but the Canadian Championship is better than anything we've had since the early '90s in Canada so I'm in no way unhappy with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, it's slightly better than nothing. But does the CSA, through the Nutrilite Canadian Championship, do any thing to bridge the enormous gap that exists between professional and amateur players development in Canada?

I like the US Open Cup too and wish the Americans would recognize the great little tournament it could be but the Canadian Championship is better than anything we've had since the early '90s in Canada so I'm in no way unhappy with it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...