rdroze Posted March 17, 2011 Share Posted March 17, 2011 For those fearful of Guatemala, I would expect they should be cracking the top twelve by virtue of their Gold Cup qualification. Guatemala's "successful" qualification for the Gold Cup comprised losses to Costa Rica and Honduras, and a single win over Nicaragua (then ranked 157th in the world). Guatemala's not getting anywhere near 12th in CONCACAF by May; perhaps by July if they do really well in the GC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboAl Posted March 17, 2011 Share Posted March 17, 2011 Its not about only Canada. Its also about sides like Jamaica, El salvador, Guatemala, Panama, Haiti, Surinam and Honduras (what I call the middle class of the region). Look what happened in 2004, all of these sides got pitted in two groups whereas T&T got mex, St. Vincent, and St.Kitts. As a result of the easy path, T&T got to play 10 more valuable games in the hex. Think of what that means for player experience and how it hinders in the long term those sides that I mentioned by not playing those extra games. Most of those sides were better than T&T. Perhaps. I guess it always seems that we are the only ones aggrieved at the qualification process. We'll just have to "trust" FIFA to have a WC draw free from the clutches of Jack Warner. Yeah, I know...I'm pretty naive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFCRegina Posted March 17, 2011 Share Posted March 17, 2011 To reiterate. Its not about looking for the easiest path to success for Canada. Its about development and growth of the game in Canada. The format has a lot to do with how you progress as a side from world cup cycle to the next. And, it has a lot to do with growing the fan base. 1) You are not going to grow the fan base by playing the minnows in tournament one year before anybody is even thinking about World cup soccer 2) Our up and coming players will not get the experience (to carry over to 2018) and the development as a player because they will play fewer games against quality sides. You're right, but we can use these first group games as a way to work younger players into their first caps. Yes, it would be nice to play stronger sides, but it's also nice that we can take an A- team into a game, and make 3 subs of youth players to cap them. More games is still beneficial, just in a different way. At the end of the day, we've been playing more games against stronger sides, than last time, even with the WCQ games, we'll still have played proportionally more strong teams than weak teams than we did last time. Bad habits may be developed, but more likely our players will have their habits developed already. What the minnow games will do is build confidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasonm Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 I like the new format. More games to move around smaller stadiums in Canada. 10,000 seats for a minnow team would be perfect. I hope they continue doing the full draw like 2010 qualifying draw. Everything was mapped out before the first kick. No surprises except using May 2007 rankings to help T&T. http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/tournament/preldraw/2010_fwc_preliminary_drawinformation_north_central_america_caribbean_e_28448.pdf I am more worried about playing minnow nations than Guatamala. Over confidence can lead to quick downfalls and waiting four more years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 Its not about only Canada. Its also about sides like Jamaica, El salvador, Guatemala, Panama, Haiti, Surinam and Honduras (what I call the middle class of the region). Look what happened in 2004, all of these sides got pitted in two groups whereas T&T got mex, St. Vincent, and St.Kitts. As a result of the easy path, T&T got to play 10 more valuable games in the hex. Think of what that means for player experience and how it hinders in the long term those sides that I mentioned by not playing those extra games. Most of those sides were better than T&T. Hmm... About T&T - those 10 valuable games didn't actually help them in the end. They failed to qualify for the Gold Cup. What's their strength these days? I like the new format. More games to move around smaller stadiums in Canada. 10,000 seats for a minnow team would be perfect. I hope they continue doing the full draw like 2010 qualifying draw. Everything was mapped out before the first kick. No surprises except using May 2007 rankings to help T&T. http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/tournament/preldraw/2010_fwc_preliminary_drawinformation_north_central_america_caribbean_e_28448.pdf I am more worried about playing minnow nations than Guatamala. Over confidence can lead to quick downfalls and waiting four more years. The MedioTempo seems to imply the March 2011 ranking will be used to seed the teams. I think we'll see something like this: Pot 1: USA, Mexico, Honduras Pot 2: Jamaica, Costa Rica, Cuba Pot 3: Panama, Canada, El Salvador, Grenada, Trinidad and Tobago, Haiti Pot 4: Antigua and Barbuda, Guyana, Suriname, St. Kitts and Nevis, Guatemala, Dominica Pot 5: Puerto Rico, Barbados, Curacao, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Cayman Islands, Nicaragua Pot 6: Bermuda + 5 First Round winners Pot 7: Belize, Dominican Republic, British Virgin Islands, St. Lucia, Turks and Caicos Islands Pot 8: Bahamas, Aruba, US Virgin Islands, Anguilla, Montserrat Mapping everything out like 4 years ago: Each semifinal group will contain one team from Pot 1, one team from Pot 2 and two Second Round group winners. The easiest group (based on Elo ratings would be): Canada, Dominica, Cayman Islands, Bahamas Hardest group: Canada, Guatemala, Barbados, Bermuda Third round (semifinal) Easiest group: Honduras, Cuba, Canada, Grenada Hardest group: Mexico, Costa Rica, Canada, Panama Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianSoccerFan Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 Edgar, the medio tiempo article has CONCACAF finishing the hex on the October 2013 FIFA dates. Didn't you say that FIFA would be playing the intercontinental play-off over two windows this time (October and November)?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CUJO Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 Group H: Mexico Costa Rica Canada Trinidad & Tobago this makes me sad.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Edgar, the medio tiempo article has CONCACAF finishing the hex on the October 2013 FIFA dates. Didn't you say that FIFA would be playing the intercontinental play-off over two windows this time (October and November)?? Yes, you're right. That's why I think CONCACAF are forcing FIFA's hand with regards to the schedule. We'll see... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfitz Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 So we only play this extra (2011) round because we're worst than 6th place in the continent? Means if we were where we should be (3rd to 5th ish) we'd actually have less qualifying games to play than for 2010? I think I'd simply prefer that everyone plays the 3rd round, and there be 22 teams that have to play the preliminary home-and-away to get into it. Then there'd at least be a few decent group round games this year. And really, we should still get in to the second round. Basically I don't like what I see as the reduction of games for teams ranked 1 to 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianSoccerFan Posted March 22, 2011 Share Posted March 22, 2011 So we only play this extra (2011) round because we're worst than 6th place in the continent? Means if we were where we should be (3rd to 5th ish) we'd actually have less qualifying games to play than for 2010? I think I'd simply prefer that everyone plays the 3rd round, and there be 22 teams that have to play the preliminary home-and-away to get into it. Then there'd at least be a few decent group round games this year. And really, we should still get in to the second round. Basically I don't like what I see as the reduction of games for teams ranked 1 to 6. It some ways it would be nice to have those extra games. However, being outside the top 6 creates a much greater chance of having a tough semi-final group. I'd rather just play friendlies this fall if it meant we'd have a better draw for the semi-final group stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theaub Posted March 23, 2011 Share Posted March 23, 2011 A successful Gold Cup combined with blowing out some crap teams could actually build some general public momentum heading into the 2012 round though. Even with a tough group, the possibility of three legitimate home games is a nice thing to think about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derofan Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Why is everyone freaking out over Guatemala we beat them in the gold cup and they by far not as powerful as Honduras. They only have one weapon that I know of and its Carlos Ruiz unless they have gotten stronger either way Guatemala, El Salvador, Panama are deinately possibilities to get some points off. Im more worried about Costa Rica and Honduras. Honduras games seem to have a lot of controversy surrounding them but well have to see. I think we can make it but we need to enlarge our player pool. Hart needs to scout more talent maybe try and get JDG2 if he isnt selected by Holland or the half Canadian impresive striker at Blackburn What are our chances that we get T&T and Guatemala in the same group in the second round? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Honestly, looking at the Guatemala squad on Wikipedia for the Copa Centroamericana, a heavy majority come from the Guatemala league. We should be able to beat guys from the likes of Communicaciones and Municipal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackdude Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Why is everyone freaking out over Guatemala we beat them in the gold cup and they by far not as powerful as Honduras. They only have one weapon that I know of and its Carlos Ruiz unless they have gotten stronger either way Guatemala, El Salvador, Panama are deinately possibilities to get some points off. Im more worried about Costa Rica and Honduras. Honduras games seem to have a lot of controversy surrounding them but well have to see. I think we can make it but we need to enlarge our player pool. Hart needs to scout more talent maybe try and get JDG2 if he isnt selected by Holland or the half Canadian impresive striker at Blackburn What are our chances that we get T&T and Guatemala in the same group in the second round? We're not comparing Guatemala to Honduras and Costa Rica. We are comparing Guatemala to the other minnows in the Carribean that Canada could face in the First Group Stage. It's clearly the team that is worrying me the most on the teams that we could face in that round. Oh and dero. Jack wouldn't put T&T in our group. He's worried that his team couldn't go to the next round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killgod Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 Honestly, looking at the Guatemala squad on Wikipedia for the Copa Centroamericana, a heavy majority come from the Guatemala league. We should be able to beat guys from the likes of Communicaciones and Municipal. While I agree, one thing you may not consider is that Communicaciones/Municpal are the dominating sides in their national league. These guys basically play together regularly, while nobody on our team plays together other than the couple guys on TFC. There's a lot to gain from playing together everyday. But again, I do agree we need to be stickin it to this nation without much of a scare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted March 24, 2011 Author Share Posted March 24, 2011 What are our chances that we get T&T and Guatemala in the same group in the second round? zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 While I agree, one thing you may not consider is that Communicaciones/Municpal are the dominating sides in their national league. These guys basically play together regularly, while nobody on our team plays together other than the couple guys on TFC. There's a lot to gain from playing together everyday. But again, I do agree we need to be stickin it to this nation without much of a scare. Yeah I know these teams, I also know that Municipal has drawn the mighty Joe Public (at home) and that Xelaju lost against CD FAS this year in CCL So they're the best teams in the country, but it does not mean much to me. Anyway, we agree so there's not much to discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscan Posted March 24, 2011 Share Posted March 24, 2011 You know, we could always sit back on the hope that Guatemala has another Revolucione, or at least a civil war. Worked for Honduras Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derofan Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 So in theory who would we be facing in the first round potentially? Belize or Caicos maybe Surinam? I seriously think that with Hoilett and JDG2 added to our squad we could at the minimum reach the hex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted March 25, 2011 Author Share Posted March 25, 2011 So in theory who would we be facing in the first round potentially? Belize or Caicos maybe Surinam? I seriously think that with Hoilett and JDG2 added to our squad we could at the minimum reach the hex I think we can make the hex with the boys who want to play for Canada Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redcoatsforever Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 So in theory who would we be facing in the first round potentially? Belize or Caicos maybe Surinam? I seriously think that with Hoilett and JDG2 added to our squad we could at the minimum reach the hex Jonathon De Guzman is not going to play for Canada. Ever. It's time to move on from that one. We have lots of firepower potential that we can just stop talking about that kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpg75 Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 A bit of good news, in Luis Suarez's first match as TD of Honduras they were violated 4-0 in South Korea with a mostly 1st string squad: http://www.diez.hn/La-Seleccion/Ediciones/2011/03/25/Noticias/Los-coreanos-humillan-a-Honduras The only omissions were Wilson Palacios, and if he's still part of the squad David Suazo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derofan Posted March 25, 2011 Share Posted March 25, 2011 Unfortunately we dont have the firepower because our build up play is good the problem is the finishing touch. It has always been our achilees heel. We need a quality striker since teams usually double up on dero and friend isnt consistent with us. Ali is a good option but against a high quality defence like US or Mexico he is ineffective. Even against Honduras in the last Gold cup semis he was shut down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegan Posted March 25, 2011 Author Share Posted March 25, 2011 Unfortunately we dont have the firepower because our build up play is good the problem is the finishing touch. It has always been our achilees heel. We need a quality striker since teams usually double up on dero and friend isnt consistent with us. Ali is a good option but against a high quality defence like US or Mexico he is ineffective. Even against Honduras in the last Gold cup semis he was shut down Ya 2 goals in 2 matches vs. Mexico and a good match vs. US in the 2007 semis but hes ineffective Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamptern Posted March 26, 2011 Share Posted March 26, 2011 The dates to remember. Let's see if we would play Saudi Arabia or New Zealand on Nov 19 in Edmonton. Link:http://www.the-afc.com/en/inside-afc/676-afc-news/33977-43-in-the-fray-for-2014-fwc-qualifiers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.