SthMelbRed Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Now that we don't have to worry about the immediate future of the Whitecaps, I thought it'd be a nice diversion to look a little further off into the future. I'm sure we all agree that it'd be ideal for the 'Caps to move into a brand-new stadium in six years (when the initial BC Place lease expires) designed for soccer as the primary use. Whether or not it will be on shores of Burrard Inlet is a discussion for another day, but what about what the stadium should look like? Here are some of my ideas: http://www.whitecapsfc.com/stadium/waterfront/renderings/ what the 'Caps have put forward, thus far. I'm not a big fan of U-shaped stadiums, but at that location, it's understandable that they want to make the amazing views as unobstructed as possible. http://www.stadiumguide.com/reebok.htm a modern football stadium which looks sleek, but has suffered from frequent accusations of being 'soulless'. I agree that it lacks character when viewed from afar. http://www.stadiumguide.com/jjb.htm a more basic modern stadium. it's basically four individual stands around a pitch with little connection between the structures. open corners might let a bit of the view in if looking at the Gastown site. http://www.stadiumguide.com/walkersstadium.htm another newish stadium. I think it has more character than the Reebok and is for substantial than the JJB. Not a bad looking ground. http://www.stadiumguide.com/hawthorns.htm a more traditional stadium which consists of four independently developed stands which have been integrated very well into a single structure without looking like a mish-mash. http://www.stadiumguide.com/bayarena.htm This one looks like a good, little stadium. Looks like one end has been largely sacrificed for corporate boxes. http://www.stadiumguide.com/volkswagenarena.htm a tribute to German efficiency? http://www.stadiumguide.com/algarve.htm covered seating for softies like me who don't want to watch in the rain, but lower, uncovered stands on the ends for the hardcores, also leaving the views open. I've included a few existing stadiums in the 20,000-30,000-range. Feel free to add others. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powerof11 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Either way...wow! The views will be amazing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuirtonPark Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 I was at The Hawthorns (West Brom) a couple of times in the mid-late 1990's while it was being rebuilt. Great fan experience, good restaurant for lunch inside the main (West) stand, good atmosphere. The rebuilding took place one side or end at a time to avoid disruption, and to spread out the capital demands. I was told the south end (bottom left on the aerial photo) cost GBP 5 million at the time. The four-sided separate structure format is common in the UK, for example Stamford Bridge, Old Trafford, Easter Road and Ibrox. Celtic Park and Emirates are more of a N. American "bowl" format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgary Boomer Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Whatever the design is...the number 1 consideration needs to be: get the most amount of people as close as legally possible to the pitch. Second biggest issue...make sure those stands have a roof over them for the sound and the protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianSoccerFan Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 If we're talking MLS sized stadiums you can do worse than Slavia Prague's new stadium. 21,000 seats with steep stands close to the pitch and an innovative wood ceiling on the roof to maximize sound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKottonmouthed1555362307 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 ^^^^^^Yeah I really like how on top of the pitch the seats are. That's how its supposed to be so that a player could grab a fans beer take a swig then take his corner kick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscan Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 That Algarve stadium could perhaps be looked at for the expansion of Stade Saputo, basing this purely on the way the seats have a similar wave pattern. It'd hold its own beside the collapsing space ship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Schaad Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Those pictures are sexy...and the seating is nice and steep as it should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SthMelbRed Posted January 9, 2010 Author Share Posted January 9, 2010 I really like the look of the pictures of the Slavia Prague stadium. It's a proper football ground with the fans right on top of the game. I'd be disappointed if the 'Caps didn't look to build something with a bigger capacity right off the bat, though. I think they should look at an initial capacity of 24,000-26,000, which would be expandable to the low-30,000s in a few years when the club is the premier club in North America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SthMelbRed Posted January 9, 2010 Author Share Posted January 9, 2010 another interior shot of Slavia's Eden Stadium, full: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SthMelbRed Posted January 9, 2010 Author Share Posted January 9, 2010 According to wikipedia, Eden Stadium cost 1 billion Czech Korunas to build ($56.5 million CAD, according to xe.com). Labour costs would be higher in Vancouver than in Prague, but I imagine Kerfoot could build a similar stadium with a bit higher capacity for not much more than the 70 million that he'd earmarked for WWS when the project was first mooted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex D Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 You can't really compare the costs of stadiums in europe to here. The typical MLS cookie cutter costs between 100-120 million US Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 NanaWall Featured in Newly Renovated Olympic Stadium B.C. Place in Vancouver NanaWall Systems, Inc. (www.nanawall.com) of Mill Valley, Calif. provided the single track sliding system for the press room and 55 sky boxes and luxury suites in the renovated B.C. Place Stadium, the site for the Opening and Closing Ceremonies at the 2010 Winter Olympic Games in Vancouver, and the home of the Canadian Football League’s BC Lions and Major League Soccer’s Vancouver White Caps. The NanaWall® SL25 movable windows have no vertical stile for a completely unobstructed view open or closed. The custom-made large opening glass window walls give spectators and the media wide open views of the Olympic ceremonies. The NanaWall is now used in 100 stadiums worldwide. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/01/prweb3434954.htm Pretty cool, would have embedded a picture here if I could figure out how! :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKottonmouthed1555362307 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Here the Nanawall pic embedded for yah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 So what code do I use for future reference, a quick look in FAQ didn't help? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regs Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 http://www.canadian-soccer.com/forum/pop_forum_code.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 ^ Thanks, didn't scroll down far enough the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earlimus Posted January 19, 2010 Share Posted January 19, 2010 I think that the original rendering is amazing. It's true that you lose some of the sound with the open U end but you gain a hell of a lot by having it. That's one hell of a view, and having it that way would make it more attractive as a concert venue as well ($$$$$). I agree that the stands being close to the pitch and covered help with the sound/ambiance, not to mention providing cover from the rain that hits the city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.