Cheeta Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 quote:Originally posted by jimmynow what's your source for the above information regarding the multiple complaints/numerous occasions. Do you work for either MLSE or the LCBO? just wondering Nope to both. Just speculating. I'm just assuming a billion dollar entity like MLSE, lawyered up to the tits as a rule, wouldn't idly allow a single incident by a third party to be cause for a penalty by a government agency to what will amount to a six digit figure. Nice sheep. I'm assuming a government agency employed by a government which draws huge revenues from the business of booze would also happily take a hit in the pocket because one time</u>, some guy gave his 17 year old brother one of his beers. And worse still, paints the agency into the corner of having to utilize this penalty again for further infractions. I expect the same punishment will have to be applied to Leaf games as well, I mean now that the precedent has been set. Nope. No idea of the facts. Just speculating. Gonna make one last piece of uninformed speculation. I'm going to guess this isn't the 1st rebuke the LCBO has made against this venue, just the latest, and has gradually escalated the penalties to this point because the previous penalties weren't driving home the point. You wouldn't know of any other penalties or restrictions the LCBO has placed on the venue over these past few years would you? Just asking 'cause I'm thousands of klicks away and have no idea. Could be wrong I guess. Maybe this really was a singularity and LCBO overreacted and went straight to nuclear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.