Jump to content

Bring Back Holger Osieck!!!


Jarrek

Recommended Posts

I'd think most, if not all, of the (on field) anti-Holger conspirators are retired by now are they not? Some of the board room ones are likely still around but who knows?

Hell, it would make for a great story though wouldn't it. Really ratchet things up around here because you know, it's been kind of dull lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holger's record after three games in the semi-final round:

0 Wins, 2 Losses, 1 tie (0 goals scored, 4 allowed)

Yallop's record after three games in the semi-final round:

0 Wins, 2 Losses, 1 tie (1 goal scored, 4 allowed)

Mitchell's record after three games in the semi-final round:

0 Wins, 2 Losses, 1 tie (3 goals scored, 5 allowed)

Just saying.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by gwallace76

Given from what I remember of Holger's selections I think this is what his lineup would have looked like...

------------Onstad-------------

--Stalteri--McKenna--Hastings--

----DeGuzman-----Hutchinson----

Radzinski---------------Brennan

-----------DeRosario-----------

------Friend------Gerba--------

Radz would never play for him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by Gian-Luca

Holger's record after three games in the semi-final round:

0 Wins, 2 Losses, 1 tie (0 goals scored, 4 allowed)

Yallop's record after three games in the semi-final round:

0 Wins, 2 Losses, 1 tie (1 goal scored, 4 allowed)

Mitchell's record after three games in the semi-final round:

0 Wins, 2 Losses, 1 tie (3 goals scored, 5 allowed)

Just saying.......

We seem to be improving. Maybe we can get to 1 loss 2 ties in 2012. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by superbrad

Radz would never play for him...

You're right. I forgot about that one. Then he would have had Stalteri on right wing, and Serioux or someone at the back.

But still. It's interesting to see what a coach like Holger would have been able to do 2 series later with the squad we have now.

Holger didn't have any productive strikers back then. He also had some major injury woes going into WCQ. None of which are a factor this time around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by SF

Easily the best tactical coach we have ever had. One of the best I've seen in Concacaf as well. To bad he lacked the people skills.

I think you might have this backwards. Holger's tactical approach with Canada was all men behind the ball, taking limited advantage counter attacking opportunities to gain set pieces. Some people didn't like him, but the players who did play were highly motivated. I'm not saying Mitchell is good tactically, but he's defintely a step behind Holger in terms of man management. People here give Dale credit for putting the our top players together, but every other manager in the world will sacrifice a couple players in order to make sure the work ethic is there and the team is competing. More than anything, Holger brought some European pedigree that most players respected. Obviously it's bad to alienate your best player, but overall I think Holger's strength was man management and not tactics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by Gian-Luca

Holger's record after three games in the semi-final round:

0 Wins, 2 Losses, 1 tie (0 goals scored, 4 allowed)

Yallop's record after three games in the semi-final round:

0 Wins, 2 Losses, 1 tie (1 goal scored, 4 allowed)

Mitchell's record after three games in the semi-final round:

0 Wins, 2 Losses, 1 tie (3 goals scored, 5 allowed)

Just saying.......

Different team for Holgar .......... give him this one and we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Holger ever did come back it could only ever work for a short period of time. He treats players like children and that doesn't fly over the long-term. He'd be like a Mike Keenan; come in and kick some ass and get results at first, then when the players stop responding to him he gets turfed.

I'd much rather bring him back as TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by youllneverwalkalone

I think you might have this backwards. Holger's tactical approach with Canada was all men behind the ball, taking limited advantage counter attacking opportunities to gain set pieces. Some people didn't like him, but the players who did play were highly motivated. I'm not saying Mitchell is good tactically, but he's defintely a step behind Holger in terms of man management. People here give Dale credit for putting the our top players together, but every other manager in the world will sacrifice a couple players in order to make sure the work ethic is there and the team is competing. More than anything, Holger brought some European pedigree that most players respected. Obviously it's bad to alienate your best player, but overall I think Holger's strength was man management and not tactics.

Not sure how you can argue that a coach who was torpedoed by his players was a good man manager. The thing with his tactical approach was that I always felt like he had the right players in the right parts of the field. Also, we often played our best in the first 20 minutues of the second half - due to some nuanced tactical adjustments. I will say that his use of the substitutes bench was often flawed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by Grasshopper

I will say that his use of the substitutes bench was often flawed.

HO's name inspired me to do a search for the word 'Budalic'.

Some of you might recall the friendly against Germany back in 2003. Germany used seven subs, Canada used 2. That was HO.

If I recall correctly, in the Mexico-Canada WCQ at Varsity in 2000, Holger didn't use a single sub.

If you were starting for HO, you had to be prepared to go 90. If you weren't starting for HO, you got splinters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...