Jump to content

Canada's Crime


canso

Recommended Posts

Pulled this off the Planet World Cup site. An outsider's perspective: what have we done to deserve such treatment? Been thinking about that and it seems obvious that Canada's Crime is that we've been neglecting the beautiful game, not paying enough attention to her, and she has scorned us for Third World Banana Republics; a more practical result is that because there is no widespread interest or media coverage we can get ripped off blatantly by corrupt referees and no one really notices.

"Speaking of Canada, I've been spending the last few weeks reading up on Canadian history. It's pretty interesting. Did you know that during and after the American Revolution, many Loyalists migrated from the USA to British Canada in order to stay under colonial rule? That the first Canadian income tax was instituted in 1917, to help pay for the war effort? That Canada had no way to amend its constitution until 1982?

So I've found a lot of interesting stuff. But I haven't found the one thing I was looking for: what HORRIBLE ACT Canada must have performed to deserve what's happened to them against Honduras. In the first game, two blown calls at the end, allowing the tying goal and taking the winning one away. In the second game, another blown call to deny them an insurance goal, and then a very-last-gasp equalizer. OK, maybe they care about ice hockey too much, and the rouge point seems a bit odd, but there has to be something much worse--was there a Canadian Inquisition, or something?

Both sides needed a win in the rematch, Canada to stave off elimination, Honduras to keep pace with the leaders. Canada were missing Paul Staltieri, still under suspension for bottle-throwing, but Atiba Hutchinson had looked good in relief, so there was no reason to panic. Honduras had a much worse problem. David Suazo, the absolutely irreplaceable David Suazo, had injured his groin while playing for Cagliari. (One newspaper coined the neat term "Suazodependencia.") Attempting to adjust, Raul Martinez Sambulá went with a 4-5-1 with Carlos Pavón the lone striker--to say the least, a very curious decision. First of all, in a game you need to win, why not start two strikers? Second, although Pavón had played well against Guatemala, the setup there had been perfect for him: a wet pitch and a small opposing back line, so he could use his centerforward skills to best advantage. This time the pitch was dry, and Canada's slow defense simply cried out for a pairing of Saúl Martínez and Milton "Tyson" Nuñez.

Pavon didn't play terribly well--but in the first half he was far from the only problem. To say Honduras were "lifeless" would be an insult to inorganic matter. Little skill, less tactical awareness, no evidence anything was at stake. In fact, they seemed to have only one player on the pitch: Édgard Alvarez, playing right midfield, who repeatedly undressed left back Ante Jazic. But nothing came of it. Canada played patiently, held off what passed for the Honduran attack, and managed a few effective counters. They even had the best chance of the half, when Iain Hume made a couple of great moves in the area but was denied by Noel Valladares.

At the interval Honduras consulted a geologist, who patiently explained that football players were different from rocks. Sambulá put Martínez in and shifted from a 4-5-1 to a 3-5-2. The team finally looked motivated, with Amado Guevara providing the impetus in midfield--but Canada, realizing they could actually win this game, held firm. Hutchinson was particularly good at right back, and Sandro Grande, getting his second straight start in midfield, was getting the ball out effectively for counters. Honduras managed a few half-chances, nothing special.

So here came Fate. In the 73rd minute Hutchinson stabbed home a corner, and Canada was ahead on a set piece, just as in the first game. But this time, surely, they would hold on. David Suazo was an ocean away, and a confused Honduras was slipping down the biological ladder again. So on a free kick, Jason DeVos headed across to Dwayne DeRosario, who chested in the clinching goal. Game over. But the dark act hidden in the bowels of Canadian history (Trappers overtrapping? Mounties not mounted?) had to be atoned for. The goal was disallowed for a foul on DeVos, and I don't need to tell you what the replay showed.

So now the result was inevitable. Honduras had regressed through sedimentary and metamorphic, all the way back to igneous, but it didn't matter. In the second minute of injury time, Sergio Mendoza lifted one into the area, Mark Watson's clearance was poor, and Danilo Turcios stuck out his leg to drive it past Pat Onstad. Another unbelievable draw. There's a lesson there somewhere, but I'm glad I don't know what it is."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our only crime is that we still don't have a national league 18 years

after our only World Cup appearence. The NASL,CSL,CPSL, have all died

in between. The chances of a league being formed in the near future

are about the same as us ever getting back to the World Cup....slim to none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our only crime is that we still don't have a national league 18 years

after our only World Cup appearence. The NASL,CSL,CPSL, have all died

in between. The chances of a league being formed in the near future

are about the same as us ever getting back to the World Cup....slim to none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by Desigol

Canada needs a few Businessmen who are prepared to invest in a league. All fine and Dandy having a League, but it's a case of "Show me the Money!" to Quote Jerry Maguire.

Until they see a realistic and sound proposal, it ain't going nowhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by The Ref

But I think the corpse was still warm.

It certainly was. With the exception of newcomers Paul Dolan and Randy Samuel plus two or three players unattached to any pro club, our team was made up of NASL veterans.

The failure of the NASL was a soccer tragedy from which we have never recovered.

db

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canada's crime is that it can't see beyond the micky-mouse sport of hockey,WWF-on-ice, the media especially, which virtually controls the apathetic public, do not seem to realise that there is another big bright world out there, that consists of major international sports. Kids in this country play soccer, BUT ---they talk hockey-who is to blame for that? Christ, we have enough talented players of all ages to compete at every world cup, IF the media promoted the sport of soccer, the interest would grow, leagues would form , advertising money would flow, especially TV revenues. UNTIL that interest is there , NOTHING will improve the world's greatest sport in this forsaken country of Canada--which I ALWAYS refer to as "The World's Soccer Wasteland"!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I see your point about the moneylender angst - I could see it being expressed if Kerry Frasier is the ref and makes yet another stupid call.

But Dave Semenko? Hmmm... I think the resemblance to Dave 'the hammer' Schultz is closer then Dave Semenko. Needs to grow a nice hirsute beard though.

schultz75-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kick his ass JC!

Back to soccer: if we are truly wandering in the "soccer wilderness", and few can doubt it given our sufferings, then does that make us the chosen people? If so we are in desparate need of a messiah to lead the way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:Originally posted by canso

Back to soccer: if we are truly wandering in the "soccer wilderness", and few can doubt it given our sufferings, then does that make us the chosen people? If so we are in desparate need of a messiah to lead the way!

I guess that depends on if you subscribe to a monotheistic or polytheistic faith to determine the scope of divine intervention. But given our doldrums, a pantheistic answer would be more desired. Imagine Ganesh as our sweeper, Vishnu as our offensive midfielder! All of Malton would come to MNT games!

But religious allegories aside, I don't think that the MNT will wander in the desert for 40 years. I honestly think that we will be better for 2010's qualification. Why? Besides blind faith (ha! what a strange saying), the developmental program will be about 6 years old by the time the World Cup has signalled its last off-side and Beckham has scuffed yet another penalty. I think the talent pool will be better and bigger. Factor in good young players from this qualification bid such as Hutchinson, Hume, DeGuzman, Simpson, and an up and coming Cam Wilson, we will be better for 2008's qualification run.

I am not saying that a portugese-esque 'golden generation' is in our midst, but i do think that now that the CSA is taking an active rather then passive interest in player development, it can only get better.

And yes, what did the 'golden generation' do in the end anyway? But don't use that against my argument!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...