Robert Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juaninho Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Honest can be qualified in so many ways. Honest at maintaining a numbing level of mediocrity? Yes. Honest at exhibiting no cohesive and constructive plan of bringing Canada's national team out of its doldrums? Yes. Honest at not trying to increase interest in Canada's national team? Yes. But if you mean honest in its most used sense, that is as an individual being a bearer of truth, standing behind facts that are true, well I don't know if that can be answered. To answer that, you'd have to have an understanding of what is going on inside the CSA and have their info. But, given the questions above and the CSA's record under Pipe and co's stewardship, one can say they are misguided in their management and dishonest with their expectations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoyleG Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 As honest as the Liberal government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffymac1971 Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 quote:Originally posted by Robert Why? The CSA is a ****ed up organziation. nuff said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soccerbeast Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 The CSA is a Good Organization, but they keep making the same mistakes, like keeping a manager who has proven to be incapable of motivating his team when it's needed. Not giving the team enough friendlies, playing 3 - 4 times a season is not enough.Having important national teams games in cities that can't even support A-League teams (Edmonton) and then only half filling the place when they do play there. How the CSA handle this upcoming World youth championships in 2007 will tell us if changes are needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soccerbeast Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 The CSA is a Good Organization, but they keep making the same mistakes, like keeping a manager who has proven to be incapable of motivating his team when it's needed. Not giving the team enough friendlies, playing 3 - 4 times a season is not enough.Having important national teams games in cities that can't even support A-League teams (Edmonton) and then only half filling the place when they do play there. How the CSA handle this upcoming World youth championships in 2007 will tell us if changes are needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loud Mouth Soup Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 quote:Originally posted by soccerbeast The CSA is a Good Organization, but they keep making the same mistakes, like keeping a manager who has proven to be incapable of motivating his team when it's needed. Not giving the team enough friendlies, playing 3 - 4 times a season is not enough.Having important national teams games in cities that can't even support A-League teams (Edmonton) and then only half filling the place when they do play there. How the CSA handle this upcoming World youth championships in 2007 will tell us if changes are needed. Jeezus, beast-you can't even decide which it is in one post. Are they good, or are they not? Make up your mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loud Mouth Soup Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 quote:Originally posted by soccerbeast The CSA is a Good Organization, but they keep making the same mistakes, like keeping a manager who has proven to be incapable of motivating his team when it's needed. Not giving the team enough friendlies, playing 3 - 4 times a season is not enough.Having important national teams games in cities that can't even support A-League teams (Edmonton) and then only half filling the place when they do play there. How the CSA handle this upcoming World youth championships in 2007 will tell us if changes are needed. Jeezus, beast-you can't even decide which it is in one post. Are they good, or are they not? Make up your mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soccerbeast Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 There is a difference between saying one is good and one that is honest. The CSA as far as i know has not done things that are not honest,but mistakes have been made as i mentioned in the previous post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soccerbeast Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 There is a difference between saying one is good and one that is honest. The CSA as far as i know has not done things that are not honest,but mistakes have been made as i mentioned in the previous post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.