Jump to content
  • Unfortunate glory and the US national team

    Duane Rollins

    For those with a sense of history, the bookending of the start and finish of the United States’ consecutive men’s World Cup appearance streak was fitting.

    It started from Trinidad. It ended there too.

    However, in the time between Paul Caligiuri’s “goal heard round the world (or at least in very specific parts of a largely indifferent at the time America)” and last night’s capitulation to a clearly inferior T&T side, so much has changed that the two events may as well have happened in different worlds.

    Then the USA was a scrappy group of underdogs that hadn’t been to a World Cup in the modern era. They had no pro league and the 1994 World Cup had not yet been awarded to the USA. Hell, Canada was better than the US back then.

    But that started to change that day. Over the next two decades the US established itself as a consistent World Cup maker and solid middle power. Famous wins came – Spain in the Confederations Cup, Mexico in the Round of 16 in 2002 – and what was largely a niche sports product became decidedly mainstream, at least when talking about every four years.

    If you had been around prior to 1990, that rise was remarkable. If you came after, it was still impressive, but also frustrating. The United States is not used to being a middle power in sport. It’s not something that sits well with Americans, who want to be at the top of the world in everything that they do.

    And they have reason to want that and to believe it possible. The USA is rich – spectacularly rich – both literally and in human resources. The country has amazing infrastructure that is the envy of more established football cultures.  Those factors really should be enough to overcome the fact that the sport was not part of the country’s soul, like it is in much of the world.

    But, it didn’t. After a solid upward trajectory that ended with a missed Torsten Frings handball that, if called, would have sent the US to a World Cup semi-final, things just kind of stagnated at a men’s national team level. There had been positive changes – MLS improved greatly, attendance at games massively increased and the women’s side of the game boomed – but there were still issues that were clear to anyone who was paying attention.

    There was fractures in the youth systems, professional teams were sacrificing young domestic talent to bring in big, foreign names, too much of development was left to an inadequate NCAA system and, it appeared that profits – especially as it relates to pat-to-play -- were being prioritized over true technical work.

    As with anything, the solution to those issues is not simple, but it starts with recognizing that there is a problem.

    After a slip back to the pack in 2006, people were starting to have those hard conversations. It may not have reached a critical mass, but influential voices were starting to make themselves heard towards the latter part of the last decade.

    And then Landon scored.

    The last minute Landon Donovan winning goal over Algeria became the true “goal heard around the world” of US soccer. It happened not with a few football geeks watching, but with a nation of soccer bros cheering it on from packed pubs around the United States.

    Donovan’s goal is, without a doubt, the single most memorable moment in modern American soccer history. It also might have been a little bit of unfortunate glory. It changed the narrative from “what are we doing wrong” to “we believe that we will win.”

    The evidence didn’t back up the latter belief.

    In hindsight, the USA’s 2010 World Cup is completely uninspiring. A point was saved against England because of a bizarre keeping error, two goals were allowed against unfancied Slovenia and it took 91 minutes to find a goal against an Algerian team that finished bottom of the group.

    The US was two minutes from going home. As it was, they were home a few days after the exhilaration of Donovan’s goal, with Ghana finishing off a mediocre 1-1-2 World Cup for the USA.

    But, the thousands of new fans that came into the fold that day don’t remember the fits and starts versus Slovenia and didn’t care about the systemic issues were there to see if you looked hard enough. They just saw the goal. And they were ready to see more.

    So, seven more years have passed and the same issues that were there in the 89th minute versus Algeria remain. They’re just seven years deeper and more difficult to address. As many have pointed out those seven years are black hole in US development, with very few players developed during that time having a significant role in the current side.

    Again, this take, like any, is overly simple. However, the narrative matters and American fans, observers and influencers are operating under a much different narrative today.

    This time Landon wasn’t there to save the day and the next Landon won’t have an opportunity to do it on the biggest stage for another five years.

    Believing that they will win is no longer going to cut it. It’s time for USA soccer to start working towards that.            


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Image from iOS.jpg

  • Posts

    • Well at least that's better than the usual we're too big a country. That was getting a bit old. Do you think MLSE and Saputo called up the CSA? The CSA is responsible for the development of the game in Canada. Those leagues were 100 years in the making. By a board that was by men, for men. Time to put the focus on the other gender.    
    • A gentle reminder to all that women's leagues and women's clubs require one important thing, and it's the exact same thing that men's leagues and men's clubs require: investors! Ultimately, Toronto FC was launched because investors (MLSE) came to the table. Ultimately, CF Montreal was launched because investors (Saputo) came to the table. Ultimately, the CPL was launched because investors (Bob Young, Rob Friend, Atletico Madrid) came to the table.  Canada Soccer's role is to sanction these leagues/clubs by assessing the standards met by the investors and holding them to these standards. Women's soccer is delayed in Canada for one reason only ... investors still do not see it as a viable commercial enterprise.  When (and if) that changes, Canada will be able to provide more opportunities for women to coach and manage women professional players. Until then, even our national broadcasters don't care enough. However, performance on the field matters. As the men continue to rise, it will help the women too. Ultimately, investors want one thing ... ROI.  It needs to be clear, visible, and highly probable.
    • Always consult a health care practitioner prior to engaging in these things. I do follow what this guys says though:    
    • Famous last words here.  I hope you’re right but these days, who knows 
    • I think they'll do fine with ticket sales, hope the weather is ok so they get the butts in the seats. Cheaper tickets and club seats have been selling apparently with slower sales in the more expensive centerline seating as expected.
    • I know, I am just posting telling people why there will not be end zone stands adding seating to game.   
    • Fair, though I think that's essentially what I assumed they'd be doing. If the league is surviving and thriving in 25 years, then there's no reason for the MLS teams to move because the league will have gotten there without them. If it isn't, then we've still got 3 active teams in a high league.
    • I grew up playing against Hamilton Serbia and Hamilton Croatia. For those across the country as you can imagine these teams were passionate about their soccer. It was always an incredibly fun game even at the u12 level.  Anyway I have a friend who is very ingrained in their closeknit community. (A childhood friend of Borjan and his kids have trained with Red Star coaches). When I brought up Mitrovics dad and the tweet regarding the Olympic roster he immediately told me that his dad is going to ruin his career. Spoke very highly about Stefan being one of the best youth players he had ever seen, but had nothing good to say about the dad.
    • It's great they have the opportunity in Portland. And she gets the highest praise for calling it an embarrassment. We flaunt our culture as empowering and laud our great women's team as a shining example of it. You couldn't be farther from the truth. I love that FIFA is opening an investigation into the NWSL allegations, but what they should really be looking into is how in 2021 we have invested nothing into women's infrastructure. I'm not talking about NWSL teams here or a league of that stature, that's just fantasy. But there's got to be something we can do to help women across the country who want to take the game seriously. A women's league isn't about bringing Ashley Lawrence, Kadeisha Buchanan and Jessie Fleming home. It's about giving a thousand times that the pathway and the dream. Just like the CPL isn't about bringing Alphonso Davies and Jonathan David home. The Nordic countries are 50 years ahead of us in terms of women's leagues. They have no dreams of grandeur. Most of their best women play abroad. But they have a place where their women can take the game seriously and talented young girls are sought out and sign on and compete against highly skilled players of all ages.
  • Create New...