Jump to content
  • Finding the audience

    Duane Rollins

    It almost seems blasphemes to openly worry about CanPL popularity at this point. Suggesting that the league will struggle to find relevance in a crowded sports market is something grumpy old sportswriters, clueless hockey fans and (some) Ottawa Fury fans do.

    The rest of us are all in. True believers in this wonderful project. Planning has been ongoing for five years now. Everything has been put in place to make this thing work.


    It’s failed before. Twice. First when the NASL blew up in 1984 (although that was more top do with American teams – OK, the New York Cosmos – overspending and ultimately misreading the market. Once the stars left so did the fans. The second time was all on us though. The CSL died on the vine in the 1990s and with it the hopes of nearly two decades of Canadian soccer.

    Those failures are not viewed with nuance by most. Rather, it’s just proof that trying again is foolish and that it’s only a matter of time until it all comes crashing down again.

    If you’re reading this you probably feel that things are different this time. You understand that two of the three NASL teams that didn’t fold (Whitecaps and Toronto Blizzard) were in Canada and both would have continued on if the league had not pulled the plug. It’s appreciated that the CSL was littered with owners who had far more good intentions than actual capital and that the CanPL owners are running in a completely different tax bracket.

    You get all that, but that doesn’t mean that the feeling will be held by the majority of sports fans in this country. Those grumpy sportswriters and broadcasters still hold a lot of influence. The most listened to sports radio show in the country has featured two segments on the latest attempt to start a spring football league in the USA, but not a single word on CanPL.

    We in the soccer community can dismiss the importance of this, but the reality is it’s an obstacle that is going to need to be overcome for the league to thrive.

    Note, I said thrive, not survive. It will survive just fine. The demographics have shifted. The soccer-hating generation is literally dying off. Twenty years ago it would have been inconceivable that the three MLS teams would have become as important to their market as they have. Now, it’s silly to even suggest that’s going to change. Flash-forward 20 more years and it stands to reason that many of the current CanPL markets, and some we have yet to even conceive, will feel the same way about their soccer team as Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal feel about theirs now.   

    But, there will be struggles initially. Struggles to get attention and to get butts in the seats.

    And, make no mistake, those that want the sport to fail – and their remains a few who do – will glory at any struggle the clubs face.

    Hell, even MLS still faces this in certain places. To the point that they had the research firm Boston Consulting research the market in 2015 so that they could grow their fan base. This is useful to CanPL fans in that they also included Canada in the research. Although they did not separate the data, you can draw conclusions of what CanPL will be facing when it comes to getting people to care.

    What they found was that 66% of MLS fans fell into one of two broad categories. The “Soccer enthusiasts”--  highly engaged, soccer-first fans – and the “Hardcore Sports Fan – basically the crazy guy at the end of the bar that can talk in detail about the 1996 Western Regional final in NCAA basketball while filling out his fantasy NFL line-up and watching the Sens play the Hurricanes on a Tuesday night in November

    That guy also likes soccer now. That’s a change over last couple decades.

    The thing is those two groups only account for 32% of all soccer fans. So, MLS is missing out on 68% of its potential market.

    Therein lies the biggest problem for CanPL. How do you avoid the same resistance to MLS that more than 2/3 of American soccer fans have?

    It starts by understanding why that 68% aren’t watching their local team. There the numbers are a little less obvious.

    The inclination of many would be to assume that those fans are so-called “Eurosnobs,” – fans only interested in watching the highest levels of play. However, the MLS research suggests that only 2% of fans fit that description. Related, that 2% account for 98% of the posts on BigSoccer’s US abroad forums.

    Where, then, do the rest fit in? We can only speculate, but it stands to reason that a good chuck are “MexiSnobs” and a good number don’t have a local team to relate to.

    You can’t do much about the ____Snobs fans. They have made up their mind for the most part. But, on the latter point you can absolutely address it. You need to be doing all in your power to make sure that the clubs are extensions of the community they represent.

    MLS does a lot of things right, but they often default to the business side of life. If you talk to a lot of MLS fans they will tell you that their loyalty is to the stand that sit in and the friends that have made at the game over the years more than it is to the franchise that they watch.

    Even as MLS teams do things to become true “clubs” they can’t ever totally shake that “franchise” label. The CanPL has the great advantage of being able to look at everything MLS has done right and everything that it has done wrong.

    And that might allow them to tap into the missing 68% more effectively.  

    Edited by Duane Rollins

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.

    Please sign in to comment

    You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

    Sign In Now

  • Image from iOS.jpg

  • Posts

    • https://x.com/canmntbible/status/1729332983520264538?s=46&t=spIaqlQfufAO3HreB1455Q canmnt bible guy saying some bad news apparently about a dual national, but tweeted after that there’s some good news attached to it? No clue what this is referencing. I know Jamaica is making a big dual nationals push, so I wonder if Jebbison, who I think is eligible, decided to play for them or something.    No idea how legit this guy’s sources are, but he posts a lot about the team, so maybe something to keep an eye on 
    • Recent example of Perruzza at HFX too.
    • Small sample size admittedly but addling to the point, even strikers like J Hams, E Welshman and others that have come back to CPL have not torched the league either 
    • Ya. I'm not even sure who it should be. One thing I don't like is having a keeper as captain. I like it to be a field player
    • I thought of that - but I would like to see it more before I give any thoughts on it. Could be worth considering in this conversation though, certainly. 
    • David just captained Lille on the weekend
    • That's odd. Why would the USA only want to play a single match? Not really like them, is it? I dunno....this is feeling like the past few windows where he have declared we may consider playing a friendly but already the options are dwindling quicker than we can get the word "friendly" out of our mouths. 
    • Who should captain Canada. That's an interesting topic... Davies - The most talented player at the highest club level can sometimes captain your side on the strength of those things alone, but I could see it going both ways with Alphonso. It could galvanize him and push him to a new level with the National team and drag the team along by extension, or it could put too much pressure on him and bring his worst qualities out. I am split 50/50 on this, but leaning towards NO because already there is uncertainty around how we use him? What his best position is? And I think everyone would agree we don't consistently get the best out of him - so putting the armband on him? I think it just putting the cart before the horse at this point. Figure out where and how to use Davies first and once that is settled maybe then he could grow into the Captain role.  Eustaquio - My gut reaction is always YES YES YES. He's playing at one of the higest levels and is the heartbeat of the team, so again that makes him an obvious candidate. He doesn't have to bark at the guys, just lead by example and give the lads a boost. These are all things in his favour. Unlike Davies, I don't think anything changes with Stephen whether you declare him captain or not - he's a mature player in his prime who knows what he is - I just don't see it affecting his game negatively and maybe it gives him a slight boost, but honestly I feel like this player is already at his ceiling for club and country. I think we could do worse than Staq as captain, but let me consider who else may be an option... Johnston - If you asked me this last year I would have probably said he's a front runner. Supposedly he has a world class mentality, which I don't doubt if you can pull yourself from League 1 Ontario to MLS and then to Celtic, but I do have some doubts. Firstly, is this a guy who is a locked in starter? Right now I would say no and last year I would have said yes. I think someone who doesn't always start can be an alternative captain, or a stand in captain, and maybe that should be bestowed on him, but you want the guy who is THE captain to be starting matches consistently and personally I think Laryea offers more than Johnston at the moment, depending on the opponent and such. Laryea was fantastic over the past two matches and Johnston was decent. Not outstanding, but decent.  Miller - I like what @Shway is saying there about him upthread, but I don't know if I am sold on the idea. What it could do is help Miller elevate his game to another level and maybe find some consistency. As good as he can be on the ball and in the tackle, he still seems to have a mistake in him. Maybe the responsibility of wearing the armband would help him stay dialed in, because the lapses with Miller are obviously mental. On the other hand, there are bigger factors than just who will benefit most from wearing the armband. Do the players see Miller as a leader? Does Miller see himself as a leader? These are things that are required and things I have questions around.  Hoilett - This is the one guy who has actually worn the armband so not much to break down here. He was seemingly the 3rd captain after Atiba and Borjan, so maybe he is the number 2 right now until Borjan goes and maybe with Milan possibly out of the door he is THE captain. The players are going to respect him on and off the field, respect his talent and his career and contributions, even as he enters his twilight. I can see him being like Atiba - defacto captain on and off the field - but obviously has to be on the field to wear it. Is there anyone else? Vitoria? Kind of like Hoilett, no? Here is how I will sum it up starting today: Borjan Hoilett Vitoria  Eustaquio And when Borjan and Vitoria are phased out: Hoilett Eustaquio Davies (maybe Johnston or Miller) I think Davies as a vice captain or assistant captain could prevent him from putting too much pressure on himself, but give him enough responsibility to affect things positively. Regardless the players will look up to him no matter what.
    • If anyone has read the book The Captain Class, Miller probably would be a prime example similar to the team captains they highlight in it.
    • Kinda sucks. I think Panini makes better sticker albums than Topps. Topps makes better cards though.  Edit: can't Find any sources saying Panini lost FIFA. Most articles are about them losing UEFA 
  • Create New...