Jump to content
  • The 2019 Canadian women’s national team is being called, by serious players who have even watched the games that aren’t on TSN, our best ever. The only serious argument would come from the circa 2003 team, which was mostly too young but featured apex Andrea Neil and was the only major tournament where both 20-year-old Christine Sinclair and 35-year-old Charmaine Hooper were within reasonable range of their primes. That team didn’t beat anybody they weren’t supposed to beat, but they beat everybody they had to and got us our best-ever fourth-place finish at a World Cup. You could argue for our 2016 Olympic team, but since that’s this team with some young players replaced by inferior old ones, it sort of concedes the argument.

    Naturally, the rest of the world has not sat still. As we know this is also the best Dutch team ever, the best Australian, probably the best English, and overall maybe the best American, which is a thought to chill the blood. Even last year, at home, this Canadian team was distinctly outplayed by Germany.

    Yet sit down, plan Canada’s path to victory, and it is the right side of insane. If we win our group, which is difficult but realistic, we get a round-of-16 match against most likely England or Japan. That’s rough for a round-of-16 game, but Canada winning would arguably not even be a surprise. England is good, but maybe a bit overrated; certainly not off Canada’s tier. Japan seems to be on the way down. We’ve also beaten both teams recently after some long cold streaks. The last World Cup aside, and we absolutely could have won that game, Canada’s had England’s number since 2014 or so. Get through that and the probable quarter-final is against Australia, an easier opponent, or a pupu platter of South Korea/Brazil/Norway-type outfits who could upset the Aussies but aren’t really in our weight class. Then you’re in the money, and the rest of the way every team is either good or on a roll, but the most probable semi-final opponent is Germany and even though it didn’t really count we’ve beaten them too…

    Read more at Maple Leaf Forever!

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • The problem with that though is that the CSA hadn't made any written commitments in a Victoria context about a pro team at USSF D2 level prior to imposing the moratorium unlike in Ottawa. The Highlanders were rumoured to be going after USL Pro at USSF D3 level and Tony Waiters was hired in that sort of context by USL. The CSL (the latter day one that eventually got desanctioned by Montagliani & Co and still exists in southern Ontario as an unsanctioned semi-pro league) were sanctioned for the regional semi-pro sort of level in a Canadian context by the CSA and were still actively talking about western expansion so going after D3 was more problematic than D2. The Highlanders were grandfathered in OK at PDL level though and PDL entry wasn't an issue in BC in sanctioning terms in the absence of an L1O type league. Ditto Alberta with the Foothills and Manitoba with WSA Winnipeg. Meanwhile in Ontario, FC London (who had been the London group interested in stepping up to USL Pro) and KW United (complex history but grew out of the group that had been interested in a USL Pro team in Hamilton from what I remember and initially had a PDL team in Hamilton that grew out of Hamilton's W League entry) eventually ran into the same sorts of issues on annual sanctioning in a PDL context that the Ottawa Fury later did with the USL Championship. FC London agreed to move to L1O as they had never been keen on PDL's short season format, while KW United eventually folded outright after initially using a partnership with TFC to continue in PDL.
    • Thanks for the info, especially with the CFL factor.
    • I hope folks continue to underestimate us.  I am still more comfortable with us being the underdog.  
    • Yeah, I think folks are being a bit hard on him.  He was out of action for quite a while coming into this season.  He seems to be in the upswing and had a great MLS is back tournament.  I agree with the idea that we may be getting him to commit when he isn’t at a peak moment but I still think he could be an important part of the program not just in the distant future but fairly soon.   The reality is that he is still only 21.   We really have no idea where his ceiling is.  And an MLS-quality striker at 21 is pretty impressive.  
    • this Jorge Ramos guy reminds me  of the some of the NHL pundits  on TSN and Shitsnet  that wrote off  the Montreal Canadiens during the Leaf series  Fuck Him . The female pundit is cute
    • i like what you're thinking. also, look for the costa rica game in novermber to possibly be in winnipeg or ottawa (just my prediction). bmo, bc place, and commonwealth all have cfl games that weekend. and i'm pretty sure the Ticos have grass at their home stadium.
    • It should boil down to what the players want here.  I hope the site selection doesn't turn into some CSA political drama.
    • We seem to be causing controversy among other pundits in the region. I don't speak Spanish but as best as I can tell these Spanish-speaking pundits (I'm assuming Mexican) about 10 minutes into this video claim that Canada is a threat but mostly because Victor Montagliani is the Concacaf President. The guy who mentions this also points out that in addition to Davies, we also have Kaye, Osorio and Cavallini although the mention of the latter's name almost sends the outspoken one, Jorge Ramos, into disdainful convulsions. I generally get the impression that Ramos thinks that not only is Canada complete shit but so is everyone else in the region in comparison to Mexico & the US, although again, it has to be stressed that I am gleaning more than I am translating.  
  • Create New...